
174
Innovations in Food Packaging
implemented on a commercial scale for specific atmospheric modification, in part due
to the variation in the response of fruits to apparently similar coatings and to uncon-
trolled factors which influence the coating performance. Different factors that can
affect the performance of coating-hit systems are type of fruit, coating surface cov-
erage, coating thickness and permeability, and temperature.
Banks et al. (1 993) proposed a mathematical model to explain the interaction between
a fruit and a coating system. Through this study they tried to explain the variability of
results found in the literature. They described coatings performing either as a film
wrap or by blocking pores. The first mechanism is called the loosely adhering coating
(lac) model. In the lac model the coating is assumed to function like a film wrap cov-
ering the fruit skin, where coating and fruit resistances act in series (Ben-Yehoshua
and Cameron, 1989; Hagenmeier and Shaw, 1992). In this model, hit resistance is the
result of pore and cuticle resistance operating in parallel. The modified atmosphere
(MA)
generated in the coated fruit will depend on coating permeability and coating
thickness. The second mechanism is called the tightly adhering coating (tac) model.
The tac model assumed considers that the coating tightly covers pores and cuticle, so the
porelcoating and cuticlelcoating resistances are added in parallel. In this model, pore
blockage is more important than coating characteristics. Thus, MA will depend on the
differing proportions of pores blocked by the coating. Between the lac and tac models,
the real mechanism is still unknown.
One factor not considered throughout the literature is the relative humidity
(RH)
of
storage conditions. RH is known to affect the permeability values of hydrophilic films
(McHugh et al., 1993,1994; McHugh and Krochta, 1994a, 1994b). Usually fruits are
stored between 90 and 95% RH; however, values lower than these are common in
commercial practice and in research studies.
The transmission of molecules through polymer films, known as permeability, is a
basic function of the chemical structure and other factors such as polymer morphol-
ogy, including density, crystallinity, and polymer orientation. Higher densities, higher
degrees of crystallinity, and cross-linking will all decrease the permeability of a poly-
mer film. The type of solvent used in casting films and the drying rate will also influ-
ence the permeability coefficient (Pauly, 1989). Plasticizers are often added to increase
film flexibility; however, this will also increase film permeability (McHugh et al., 1994;
McHugh and Krochta, 1994a; Mate and Krochta, 1996). Water is the most effective
plasticizer in hydrophilic films, and the amount of moisture in the films is related to
the
RH
of the environment through their moisture sorption isotherm behavior (Gontard
et al., 1996). Thus, permeability of hydrophilic films and films formed as coatings
increases at higher RH due to increasing moisture concentration within the film (Mark
et al., 1966; Elson et al., 1985; Rico-Pena and Torres, 1990; Hagenmeier and Shaw,
1991; McHugh and Krochta, 1994a). This increase in permeability is also related to a
decrease in the glass transition temperature of the film.
An
amorphous polymer matrix
may exist as a viscous glass or a liquid-like rubber state. The change from one state to
another will strongly depend on water content or other plasticizers. The glass-rubber
transition will affect molecular mobility of the system which can be observed
as
changes
in viscosity, difisivity or flexibility of the system (Roos and Karel, 199 1; Buera and
Karel, 1993; McHugh and Krochta, 1994a).