
Preservative packaging for fresh meats, poultry, and fin fish
217
The microbial spoilage of fish
in
air is similar to that of red meats, and it is also due
to the activities of gram-negative species, particularly pseudomonads,
S.
putrefaciens,
and Photobacterium phosphoreum. These organisms degrade amino acids to produce
ammonia, amines, organic sulfides, and hydrogen sulfide. However, microbial
spoilage occurs faster
in
fish than in red meat, as the final pH of fish muscle is nor-
mally greater than pH 6 and little glucose is available in fish muscle. This situation
results in fast growth rates for pH-sensitive spoilage organisms and early exhaustion
of available glucose, with initiation of catabolism of amino acids and other nitroge-
nous compounds. Longer shelf lives are associated with fish from tropical waters, in
which the initial flora is dominated by gram-positive organisms, which generally
cause less offensive spoilage.
A major factor contributing to the spoilage of fish is the osmoregulatory molecule
trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) in fish muscle (Whitfield, 1998). Gram-negative bac-
teria, such as
S.
putrefaciens and
P
phosphoreum, use TMAO as an alternative termi-
nal electron acceptor to oxygen during respiration. That reduces the odorless TMAO,
(CH3)3N0, to trimethylamine (TMA), (CH3)3N, which imparts a strong ammonia
odor to the meat. The TMAO reductases of
S.
putrefaciens, and
P
phosphoreum are
constitutively expressed, but expression is repressed in the presence of 02, resulting
in increased TMA production in micro-aerobic and anaerobic conditions (Easter
et
al., 1983). The activity ofTMAO reductase is
pH
sensitive, and at high C02 concen-
trations may be reduced because of acidification of fish muscle by dissolved C02
(Gibson and Davis, 1995).
An
increase in pH, consequent on the production of ammo-
nia from amino acids, also inhibits TMAO reductase and reduces its contribution to
spoilage (Gibson and Davis, 1995).
The elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) use urea rather than TMAO as an osmoregula-
tor, and muscle from these fish may contain up to 2.5% urea. Microbial spoilage then
occurs primarily because of the production of ammonia as a result of bacterial urease
activity (Jemmi et al., 2000).
Because of the high pH of most fish muscle, growth of the facultatively anaerobic
S.
putrefaciens is not prevented by vacuum packaging, so that organism may dominate
the spoilage process in vacuum-packaged fish (Jorgensen and Huss, 1989). However,
P
phosphoreum, utilizing TMAO to maintain respiratory metabolism, may be largely
responsible for the spoilage of fish such as cod inVP (Dalgaard et al., 1993). The rate
of growth for
P
phosphoreum and
S.
putrefaciens is not greatly reduced by anaerobic
conditions (Jorgensen et al., 1988). Consequently, the extension of shelf life achieved
by vacuum packaging of fish is often small (Davis, 1998).
There has been some investigation of the use of high O2
MAP
with fish, with the aim
of reducing
TMA
production by repressing TMAO reductase expression. Boskou and
Debevere (1997) have demonstrated that TMA production by
S.
putrefaciens growing
on a fish extract can be inhibited by 10% oxygen. Guldager et al. (1998) have also
reported inhibition of TMA formation on refrigerated cod fillets under 40% oxygen.
However, such systems can do little to delay other forms of spoilage caused by grarn-
negative organisms.
Although the growth of
S.
putrefaciens is greatly inhibited by high concentrations of
carbon dioxide, low O2 MAP also may give only a modest extension of fish storage