
PORTUGUESE AFRICA
effect, the traffic thus gained by Lobito was lost by Beira" and the
Mozambique Company.
Superficially, Angola in the late 1930s was not an especially
backward colony. Investment per
capita
may have been higher
than in any other territory between the Zambezi and the Sahara,
except for the Belgian Congo. In relation to total population,
Angola's external trade in
193 5
may well have been more valuable
than that of Nigeria or the Belgian Congo.
16
There was nothing
very remarkable about the lack of local industries for processing
exports, or for manufactures. By African standards, however,
both Angola and Mozambique, like the Belgian Congo, showed
a poor return in the shape of external trade for capital investments,
public and private. And there were obvious differences between
the Portuguese territories and the Belgian Congo. In the latter,
massive investment had been geared, among other things, to the
production and transport of a major export, copper, which was
valued by industrial economies. There was no such congruence
between Angola's railways and harbours and its exports (indeed,
its diamonds were exported through the Congo), while huge sums
had been spent in the vain search for oil. Moreover, there had
been, in the Portuguese territories, scarcely any investment in
manpower, in the form of education and social services for even
a part of the African population: the only significant exception
was the diamond zone in north-eastern Angola, where Diamang
enjoyed virtual autonomy and fought sleeping-sickness through
a network of hospitals and first-aid posts. By and large, Africans
in Angola continued to
be
gravely enfeebled by
sickness,
ignorance
and alcohol: imports of Portuguese wine were if anything greater
in the 1930s than in the previous decade. At the same time, the
real cost of living for Africans, which in Luanda at least may have
risen by 75 per cent between 1913 and
1933,
l7
was further raised
by new restrictions, from
1931,
on non-Portuguese imports. Over
the decade, African real earnings, whether from wages or crop
sales,
declined even below the levels of the 1920s. In 1930—3 the
country suffered not only from trade depression but from terrible
droughts and locust invasions: in 1934 Luanda was described in
a local newspaper as a population of'living skeletons'.
18
It was
16
S. H. Frankel, Capital
investment
in Africa (London, 1938),
202-3,
1O
T>
c
^- '7°-
17
F. C. C. Egerton, Angola
in perspective
(London, 1957), 108.
18
Jill Dias, 'Famine and disease in the history of Angola, c. 1830-1930',
Journal of
African History, 1981, 22, 3, 377.
5 3O
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008