N o t e s t o C H A P t e r f o U r 263
“Crisis, Chronology, and the
shape
of
european social
History,”
American Historical Review 113 (2008): 1031–52.
see
also Geof-
frey Parker, “Crisis and Catastrophe:
the
Global Crisis of the
sev-
enteenth
Century
reconsidered,
” American Historical Review 113
(2008): 1053–79.
in
his chart of major revolts and revolutions on
1055, Parker includes the appearance of
shabbetai Z
˙
evi.
3
. see Paul Hazard, La Crise de la conscience européenne (Paris,
1935); Paul Hazard, The European Mind 1680–1715, translated from
the
fre
nch by J. Lewis May (Harmondsworth,
eng
land, 1964); Mar-
garet Jacob, The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons, and
Republicans (London, 1981); and Margaret Jacob, “
the
Crisis of the
eur
opean Mind: Hazard
rev
isited,” in Politics and Culture in Early
Modern Europe, ed. Phyllis Mack and Margaret Jacob (Cambridge,
1987), 251–71.
see
also the present volume’s appendix, note 13.
4.
see
Jonathan
israel,
Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and
the Making of Modernity (
oxford, 2001), especially 1–81; the cita-
tions herein are on 7 and 17.
5. Jacob Katz, for example, despite the prominence of the notion
of “crisis” in his work, ignored completely the general economic and
political crises of
european
historiography and the cultural crisis of
Hazard and others.
on
this, see
yosef Kaplan,
“
the early
Modern
Period in the Historiographical Production of Jacob Katz” (in He-
brew), in Historiograa ba-Mivh
˙
an: Iyyun Meh
˙
udash be-Mishnato
shel Yaakov Katz, ed.
israel
Bartal and
shmuel feiner
(Jerusalem,
2008), 19–35, especially 26–35. However, in Out of the Ghetto: The
Social Background of Jewish Emancipation 1770–1870 (Cambridge,
MA, 1973), p. 228, note 25, Jacob Katz compares his own conclu-
sions about the beginnings of a structural change in traditional Jew-
ish society to those of Hugh
trevor-roper
. (My thanks to Michael
silber for this reference.)
Jonathan
israel,
on the other hand, in European Jewry in the Age
of Mercantilism, 170, offers the following ambiguous formulation:
“A mounting turmoil of inner pressures erupted in the 1650s and
1660s in a drama which was to convulse world Jewry.
furthermore,
although this Jewish upheaval had some separate and independent
roots, unconnected with the current intellectual preoccupations
of Christian
europe,
it took place during, and shared some causes
with, the deepening crisis besetting
european
culture as a whole.
in-
evitably
, the ferment within the synagogue interacted on the wider
level within
european
devotion and thought, the one chain of en-
counters pervading the other in a remarkable process of cultural
transformation.”