
HIGHER EDUCATION AND NATION-BUILDING 399
Ideals, enthusiasm, and expert planning aside, the work of
the
academic
community in the 1920s still encountered a frequent obstacle, inadequate
financial support. More than one contemporary record refers to this in
a matter-of-fact tone: ' China being in the midst of civil war, government
colleges and universities suffered from arrears in receipt of budgeted
revenues...
>I06
In order to make ends meet some professors had to teach
at two or more institutions simultaneously. In such circumstances, getting
allocations for research would be difficult, and so assistance from friends
and from outside sources could be crucial.
The sociology of knowledge may be expected to benefit from detailed
studies of the personnel configurations, groups, factions and cliques that
advanced modern learning in Republican China. To begin with, the small
elite of students abroad followed tradition by forming student fraternities
or associations
{hui)
for mutual support among themselves. Quite different
in aim and style from the secret society lodge
{tongs)
among Chinatown
merchants, these student fraternities selected and counselled junior
members, convened summer retreats, and formed personal bonds of trust
and friendship that could be of
use
later on in China. Best known of these
several groups was CCH (abbreviated from Ch'eng-chih hui, an
'association for the achievement of one's life goals', also known as 'Cross
and Sword').
107
On their return to China the young Ph.D.s became professors committed,
like all professors, to reproducing themselves; a fortunate few in
university institutes for advanced research were able to pursue their
specialities, while younger students who assisted them received training.
Peita, Tsing-hua, and Yenching in the Peking area, and Chung-shan
University and Lingnan in Canton, for example, set up specialized
research institutes and the results, generally of high quality, were
published in their own academic journals.
Among the outstanding institutes of this type was the Nankai Institute
of Economics, established in 1931 under the leadership of Franklin Ho
(Ho Lien), who as professor of public finance and statistics at Nankai
University was also pioneering Nankai's systematic studies of North China
industries. This charted a new direction in the teaching of economics in
China; instead of using Western experience and examples, the study of
Chinese economic life was not based on data gathered from within the
106
H. D.
Fong, Reminiscences of a Chinese economist
at
70, 31.
107
Now
no
longer secret, CCH published
a
history and directory.
Its
membership included
Chi
Ch'ao-ting, Chiang T'ing-fu (T.
F.
Tsiang), Chiang Meng-lin (Monlin), Fang Hsien-t'ing
(H.
D.
Fong),
Ho
Lien (Franklin Ho), K'ung Hsiang-hsi (H.
H.
Kung), Kuo Ping-wen, Meng
Chih (Paul Mcng), Tsou Ping-wen, Weng Wan-ko (Wango Weng), Yen Yang-ch'u (Y. C. James
Yen).
Personal communication from Wango Weng, August 1979.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008