
THE LATE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY 583
that the diffusion of commercial enterprises and technology would en-
hance competition, cut production costs, and reduce the prices of com-
mercial goods; yet, officials in domains across Japan constantly com-
plained of higher prices as people within their jurisdictions became
more actively involved in the commercialized sector of
the
economy.
101
Further, we need to know more about the linkage between prices and
the formation of official merchant groups.
102
Useful, too, would be
more amply documented analyses of the impact on prices of other
daimyo policies, such as the frequent bans on the import into any one
domain of goods that competed with local products. Finally, it is neces-
sary to uncover more precise and detailed information about the rela-
tionship between rice prices and commodity prices in general. It has
become somewhat of
a
truism that the eighteenth century witnessed a
rise in commodity prices in general, but a decline in rice prices.
103
Indeed, one can find documentation that would support this conclu-
sion.
104
Yet, most studies assume this inverse correlation between the
two price indices without offering a convincing explanation of why the
growth of the commercial economy should depress the rice price and
thus reduce the relative value of tax revenues and samurai incomes.
105
Although shogunal and daimyo officials frequently had an even less
precise understanding than do modern-day historians about how their
economy worked, many in the 1760s realized that a new fiscal crisis
was at hand, and so they put together a set of fresh economic policies
to address the problems confronting them. On the national level,
Tanuma Okitsugu (1719-88) became the chief architect of the sho-
101 Dohi Noritaka, "Kinsei bukka-shi no ichi kosatsu," in Nishiyama Matsunosuke sensei koki
kinenkai, ed., Edo no
minshu
to shakai (Tokyo: Yoshikawa kobunkan, 1985), pp. 415-37.
102 The Edo city magistrates, for instance, in 1723 thought that creating licensed groups of
wholesalers would give them a way to reduce prices. "Prices have risen," they claimed,
"because of competition between traders, shippers, and producers. If producers were autho-
rized to sell only to ton'ya, monopoly profits could be controlled." Quoted in Hauser,
Economic Institutional Change, p. 36. Yet, other officials would later condemn protective
associations on the grounds that their monopolistic practices acted to increase prices. See
James L. McClain, "Failed Expectations: Kaga Domain on the Eve of the Meiji Restora-
tion,"
Journal of Japanese Studies 14 (Summer 1988).
103 See, for instance, Hauser,
Economic Institutional
Change,
pp. 34-5; and Kitajima Masamoto,
Edojidai (Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1958), pp. 125-40.
104 See, for example, Ono Takeo, Edo bukkajiien (Tokyo: Tembosha, 1982). For information on
a local area, see Takase Tamotsu, "Kaga han no beika hyo," in Toyoda Takeshi, ed.,
Nihonkai
chiikishi
kenkyu, vol. 1 (Tokyo: Bunken shuppan, 1980), pp. 319-60.
105 See, for instance, Sasaki Junnosuke, Daimyo to
hyakusho,
vol. 15 oiNihon
no rekishi
(Tokyo:
Chuo koronsha, 1966), p. 160; and Kitajima Masamoto, Nihonshi
gaisetsu,
vol. 2 (Tokyo:
Iwanami shoten, 1968), pp. 201-8. As might be expected, given the nature of the data
available, scholars do not even agree that all members of the samurai class suffered a relative
loss of income. See, for instance, Kozo Yamamura, A Study of Samurai
Income
and
Entrepre-
neurskip
(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974), pp. 26-69.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008