
Chapter 7 explains that managers choose among alternative accounting meth-
ods for several important expenses (and for revenue as well). After making
these key choices, the managers should let the accountants do their jobs and
let the chips fall where they may. If bottom-line profit for the year turns out to
be a little short of the forecast or target for the period, so be it. This hands-off
approach to profit accounting is the ideal way. However, managers often use a
hands-on approach — they intercede (one could say interfere) and override
the normal accounting for sales revenue or expenses.
Both managers who do profit smoothing and investors who rely on financial
statements in which profit smoothing has been done must understand one
thing: These techniques have robbing-Peter-to-pay-Paul effects. Accountants
refer to these as compensatory effects. The effects next year offset and cancel
out the effects this year. Less expense this year is counterbalanced by more
expense next year. Sales revenue recorded this year means less sales revenue
recorded next year. Of course, the compensatory effects work the other way
as well: If a business depresses its current year’s recorded profit, its profit
next year benefits. In short, a certain amount of profit can be brought for-
ward into the current year or delayed until the following year.
Two profit histories
Figure 12-2 shows, side by side, the annual profit histories of two different
businesses over six years. Steady Flow, Inc. shows a nice smooth upward
trend of profit. Bumpy Ride, Inc., in contrast, shows a zigzag ride over the six
years. Both businesses earned the same total profit for the six years — in this
case, $1,050,449. Their total six-year profit performance is the same, down to
the last dollar. Which company would you be more willing to risk your money
in? I suspect that you’d prefer Steady Flow, Inc. because of the nice and
steady upward slope of its profit history.
I have a secret to share with you: Figure 12-2 is not really for two different
companies — actually, the two different profit figures for each year are for
the same company. The year-by-year profits shown for Steady Flow, Inc. are
the company’s smoothed profit amounts for each year, and the annual profits
for Bumpy Ride, Inc. are the actual profits of the same business — the annual
profits that were recorded before smoothing techniques were applied.
For the first year in the series, 2004, no profit smoothing occurred. The two
profit numbers are the same; there was no need for smoothing. For each of
the next five years, the two profit numbers differ. The difference between actual
profit and smoothed profit for the year is the amount that revenue and/or
expenses had to be manipulated for the year. For example, in 2005 actual profit
would have been a little too high, so the company accelerated the recording of
some expenses that should not have been recorded until the following year
(2006); it booked those expenses in 2005. In contrast, in 2008, actual profit was
running below the target net income for the year, so the business put off record-
ing some expenses until 2009 to make 2008’s profit look better. Does all this
make you a little uncomfortable? It should.
260
Part IV: Preparing and Using Financial Reports
19_246009 ch12.qxp 4/17/08 12:04 AM Page 260