// Современное право. – 2010. – №
6. – С. 69-72. В статье рассматриваются критерии соотношения виндикационного иска и иска из неосновательного обогащения. Анализируются как сходства, так и различия указанных исков. Автор приходит к выводу о невозможности конкуренции указанных исков.
Ключевые слова: конкуренция исков, виндикационный иск, неосновательное обогащение, критерии соотношения исков Podshivalov Tikhon. To a question of criteria ratio of a kondiktion and vindication // Mode law. – 2010. – N.
6. – P. 69-72. Comparison criteria of vindication action and unjust enrichment action are considered in article. Similarities and differences of said actions are analyzed. Author arrived at the conclusion about impossibility of said actions competition.
Keywords: competition of actions; vindication action; unjust enrichment (condiction); comparison criteria of actions. Tikhon Podshivalov graduated magna cum laude from Law faculty of the South Ural State University (Chelyabinsk, Russia) with a degree in jurisprudence. Since 2008th he is a lecturer of Civil Law and Process department. He holds such courses as «Russian Civil Law», «Private Inteational Law», and «Theory of Property Rights». In 2011th he defended his thesis on the topic of «Negatory action» in the Dissertation Council of the Saratov State Academy of Law, specialty
12.00.03. The basic idea of the dissertation research was to justify the fact that negatory action is not a universal way to protect property rights. Since 2012 he has been a member of the Russian Association of Inteational Law. In 2014 the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation awarded him the rank of associate professor in the specialty «Civil law; Business law; Family law; Private inteational law». Research interests - the problems of property rights protection, objects of civil rights and immovable property, the implementation of the principle of good faith (pre-contractual liability, the prohibition of circumvention of the law, estoppel, the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil, the abuse of civil rights), private inteational law. The main focus of the research is to elaborate a system of real action under the conditions of reforming the civil legislation of the Russian Federation and the changes in judicial practice, including with respect to immovable property.
6. – С. 69-72. В статье рассматриваются критерии соотношения виндикационного иска и иска из неосновательного обогащения. Анализируются как сходства, так и различия указанных исков. Автор приходит к выводу о невозможности конкуренции указанных исков.
Ключевые слова: конкуренция исков, виндикационный иск, неосновательное обогащение, критерии соотношения исков Podshivalov Tikhon. To a question of criteria ratio of a kondiktion and vindication // Mode law. – 2010. – N.
6. – P. 69-72. Comparison criteria of vindication action and unjust enrichment action are considered in article. Similarities and differences of said actions are analyzed. Author arrived at the conclusion about impossibility of said actions competition.
Keywords: competition of actions; vindication action; unjust enrichment (condiction); comparison criteria of actions. Tikhon Podshivalov graduated magna cum laude from Law faculty of the South Ural State University (Chelyabinsk, Russia) with a degree in jurisprudence. Since 2008th he is a lecturer of Civil Law and Process department. He holds such courses as «Russian Civil Law», «Private Inteational Law», and «Theory of Property Rights». In 2011th he defended his thesis on the topic of «Negatory action» in the Dissertation Council of the Saratov State Academy of Law, specialty
12.00.03. The basic idea of the dissertation research was to justify the fact that negatory action is not a universal way to protect property rights. Since 2012 he has been a member of the Russian Association of Inteational Law. In 2014 the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation awarded him the rank of associate professor in the specialty «Civil law; Business law; Family law; Private inteational law». Research interests - the problems of property rights protection, objects of civil rights and immovable property, the implementation of the principle of good faith (pre-contractual liability, the prohibition of circumvention of the law, estoppel, the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil, the abuse of civil rights), private inteational law. The main focus of the research is to elaborate a system of real action under the conditions of reforming the civil legislation of the Russian Federation and the changes in judicial practice, including with respect to immovable property.