// Арбитражная практика. – 2013. – №
2. – С. 24-31. - Что надо учитывать при выборе надлежащего способа защиты
- Когда неоспоренные правоустанавливающие документы препятствуют восстановлению прав
- Какие доказательства необходимо представить при оспаривании зарегистрированного права
Споры о принадлежности прав на недвижимое имущество весьма затратны и сложны. От того, какой способ защиты выберет заявитель, чьи права нарушены, зависит исход процесса. Поэтому иски об оспаривании права зарегистрированного в Едином государственном реестре прав на недвижимое имущество и сделок с ним (далее – ЕГРП) до сих пор вызывают повышенное внимание у сторон процесса. Однако, не смотря на практику Высшего арбитражного суда РФ по данной проблеме, пока еще нет однозначного решения вопроса о надлежащем способе оспаривания. Podshivalov T. The real estate belongs to other person: how to challenge the registered right // Arbitration practice. – 2013. – No.
2. – Page 24-31. - That it is necessary to consider at a choice of an appropriate way of protection
- When the neoargued documents of title interfere with restoration of the rights
- What evidence needs to be produced at contest of the registered right
Disputes on accessory of the rights for real estate are very expensive and difficult. From what way of protection will choose the applicant, whose rights are violated, the process outcome depends. Therefore claims for contest of the right registered in the Unified State Register of Rights on real estate and transactions with it (further – EGRP) still cause special attention in the parties of process. However, despite practice of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation on this problem, for the present there is no unambiguous solution of a question of an appropriate way of contest. Tikhon Podshivalov graduated magna cum laude from Law faculty of the South Ural State University (Chelyabinsk, Russia) with a degree in jurisprudence. Since 2008th he is a lecturer of Civil Law and Process department. He holds such courses as «Russian Civil Law», «Private Inteational Law», and «Theory of Property Rights». In 2011th he defended his thesis on the topic of «Negatory action» in the Dissertation Council of the Saratov State Academy of Law, specialty
12.00.03. The basic idea of the dissertation research was to justify the fact that negatory action is not a universal way to protect property rights. Since 2012 he has been a member of the Russian Association of Inteational Law. In 2014 the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation awarded him the rank of associate professor in the specialty «Civil law; Business law; Family law; Private inteational law». Research interests - the problems of property rights protection, objects of civil rights and immovable property, the implementation of the principle of good faith (pre-contractual liability, the prohibition of circumvention of the law, estoppel, the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil, the abuse of civil rights), private inteational law. The main focus of the research is to elaborate a system of real action under the conditions of reforming the civil legislation of the Russian Federation and the changes in judicial practice, including with respect to immovable property.
2. – С. 24-31. - Что надо учитывать при выборе надлежащего способа защиты
- Когда неоспоренные правоустанавливающие документы препятствуют восстановлению прав
- Какие доказательства необходимо представить при оспаривании зарегистрированного права
Споры о принадлежности прав на недвижимое имущество весьма затратны и сложны. От того, какой способ защиты выберет заявитель, чьи права нарушены, зависит исход процесса. Поэтому иски об оспаривании права зарегистрированного в Едином государственном реестре прав на недвижимое имущество и сделок с ним (далее – ЕГРП) до сих пор вызывают повышенное внимание у сторон процесса. Однако, не смотря на практику Высшего арбитражного суда РФ по данной проблеме, пока еще нет однозначного решения вопроса о надлежащем способе оспаривания. Podshivalov T. The real estate belongs to other person: how to challenge the registered right // Arbitration practice. – 2013. – No.
2. – Page 24-31. - That it is necessary to consider at a choice of an appropriate way of protection
- When the neoargued documents of title interfere with restoration of the rights
- What evidence needs to be produced at contest of the registered right
Disputes on accessory of the rights for real estate are very expensive and difficult. From what way of protection will choose the applicant, whose rights are violated, the process outcome depends. Therefore claims for contest of the right registered in the Unified State Register of Rights on real estate and transactions with it (further – EGRP) still cause special attention in the parties of process. However, despite practice of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation on this problem, for the present there is no unambiguous solution of a question of an appropriate way of contest. Tikhon Podshivalov graduated magna cum laude from Law faculty of the South Ural State University (Chelyabinsk, Russia) with a degree in jurisprudence. Since 2008th he is a lecturer of Civil Law and Process department. He holds such courses as «Russian Civil Law», «Private Inteational Law», and «Theory of Property Rights». In 2011th he defended his thesis on the topic of «Negatory action» in the Dissertation Council of the Saratov State Academy of Law, specialty
12.00.03. The basic idea of the dissertation research was to justify the fact that negatory action is not a universal way to protect property rights. Since 2012 he has been a member of the Russian Association of Inteational Law. In 2014 the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation awarded him the rank of associate professor in the specialty «Civil law; Business law; Family law; Private inteational law». Research interests - the problems of property rights protection, objects of civil rights and immovable property, the implementation of the principle of good faith (pre-contractual liability, the prohibition of circumvention of the law, estoppel, the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil, the abuse of civil rights), private inteational law. The main focus of the research is to elaborate a system of real action under the conditions of reforming the civil legislation of the Russian Federation and the changes in judicial practice, including with respect to immovable property.