
424 
M. 
C. 
Nucci 
4 
Singularity manifold  equations and recip- 
rocal aut 
o-B 
acklund  transformat ions 
In  1983 the concept of  the singularity manifold equation 
was 
intro- 
duced  [44]. 
While  it plays 
an 
important  rBle  in  establishing  if 
a 
partial differential equation possesses the Painlevd property, the sin- 
gularity manifold equation did not  seem 
to 
have other applications. 
In 
an 
appendix 
to 
one of his papers 
[38], 
Weiss noticed that the sin- 
gularity manifold equation of the Korteweg-de Vries equation could 
be  transformed  into the Harry  Dym equation  via an inverse trans- 
formation plus 
a 
change of  dependent  variable.  In  [36], Rogers and 
Wong derived 
a 
reciprocal auto-Backlund transformation [19] for the 
Harry Dym equation.  All these results were found 
to 
be true for the 
Korteweg-de Vries hierarchy [34]: the Harry Dym hierarchy  was ob- 
tained  by  applying 
a 
reciprocal Backlund transformation  [19] to the 
equations satisfied by the potentials of  the singularity manifold func- 
tions.  In  2+ 
1 
dimensions, substituting the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili 
equation for  the Korteweg-de Vries equation, Rogers  [32] obtained 
the  (2+1)-dimensional  Harry  Dym  equation and its auto-Backlund 
transformation using the same approach.  He noticed  that the recip- 
rocal 
auto-Blklund transformation 
was 
induced  by  the invariance 
of  the singularity  manifold equation  under  the Mobius  group. 
In 
[33], 
analogous results were  obtained  for  both  the  Caudrey-Dodd- 
Gibbon and Kaup-Kuperschmidt hierarchies and two different hier- 
archies based on  Kawamoto-type equations were derived.  In  [29], it 
was shown that these results are not exclusive 
to 
few cases but they 
are generalizable 
so 
that any singularity manifold equation generates 
a 
novel equation and  its auto-Backlund  transformation.  Let  us 
see 
how  this works.  In 
1+1 
dimensions, 
a 
singularity manifold equation 
in 
4(x,t) 
is made of  combinations of  terms such 
as: 
4t 
4X’ 
- 
and their derivatives, which are invariant under the Mobius group: