
© 1999 by CRC Press LLC
one atomic site. As a result, no Ir–Ir adhesion was observed. Because Ir–Ir adhesion is stronger than
Ir–Pb adhesion, the separation force was less in this case than it was in the absence of the Pb monolayer
(Raffi-Tabar et al., 1992). In addition, the Ir substrate was not deformed as a result of the indentation
because the Ir tip did not wet the substrate.
When a Pb tip was used to indent an Ir-covered Pb substrate, the Pb tip atoms wetted the Ir monolayer
during the JC. As a result of the JC, the contact area between the tip and the Ir monolayer was larger
and there was no discernible crystal structure present in the Pb tip. Instead, the tip appeared to have the
structure and properties of a liquid drop wetting a surface. Because of the presence of the Ir monolayer,
continued indentation of the tip did not result in the formation of any adhesive Pb–Pb bonds. During
pull off, the Pb tip formed a connective neck, which decreased in width, as it separated from the
monolayer–substrate system. This was largely due to the Pb–Pb interaction that is small compared with
the Ir–Pb interaction. The radius of this connective neck of atoms was smaller than it was in the absence
of the Ir layer. As a result, the pull-off force (i.e., the force of adhesion) was less when the Ir layer was
present.
In summary, a reduction in the force of adhesion was observed when a monolayer film was placed
between the tip and the substrate. In the Ir/Pb/Ir case, formation of strong Ir–Ir adhesion was prevented
by the presence of the Pb film; therefore, the pull-off force was reduced. In the Pb/Ir/Pb case, the smaller
radius of the connective neck between the tip and substrate was responsible for the reduction in the force
of adhesion.
Molecular dynamics has also been used to simulate indentation of an n-hexadecane-covered Au(001)
substrate with an Ni tip (Landman et al., 1992). The forces governing the metal–metal interactions were
derived from EAM potentials. A so-called united-atom model (Ryckaert and Bellmans, 1978) was used
to model the n-hexadecane film. In this model, the hydrogen and carbon atoms were treated as one
united atom and the bonds between united atoms were held rigid. The interchain forces and the inter-
action of the chain molecules with the metallic tip and substrate were both modeled using an LJ potential
energy function. The size of the metallic tip and substrate were the same as in a previous study (Landman
et al., 1990). The hexadecane film consisted of 73 alkane molecules. The film was equilibrated on a 300
K Au surface and indentation was performed as described earlier (Landman et al., 1990).
Equilibration of the film with the Au surface resulted in a partially ordered film where molecules in
the layer closest to the Au substrate were oriented parallel to the surface plane. When the Ni tip was
lowered, the film “swelled up” to meet and partially wet the tip. Continued approach of the tip toward
the film caused the film to flatten and some of the alkane molecules to wet the sides of the tip. Lowering
the tip farther caused drainage of the top layer of alkane molecules from underneath the tip, increased
wetting of the sides of the tip, “pinning” of hexadecane molecules under the tip, and deformation of the
gold substrate beneath the tip. At this stage of the simulation, the force between the Ni tip and the film/Au
substrate was repulsive. In contrast, the force between the tip and the substrate had been attractive when
the alkane film was not present (Landman et al., 1990). Further lowering of the tip resulted in the drainage
of the pinned alkane molecules, inward deformation of the substrate, and eventual formation of an
intermetallic contact by surface Au atoms moving toward the Ni tip, which was concomitant with the
force between the tip and the substrate becoming attractive.
The effect of indenter shape on the compression of self-assembled monolayers was examined using
MD simulations by Tupper et al. (1994); 64 chains of hexadecanethiol were chemisorbed on an Au(111)
substrate composed of 192 atoms. A flat compressing surface, also composed of 192 atoms, and an
asperity, which was ¼ the size of the flat surface at the point of contact, were used to compress the
hexadecanethiol film in separate studies. Equilibration of the hexadecanethiol films, prior to compression,
resulted in highly ordered films in which the sulfur head group was bound to the threefold hollow sites
in a hexagonal array with a nearest-neighbor distance of 4.99 Å. The temperature of the system was
maintained at 300 K while the films were compressed by moving the flat surface (or the asperity) closer
to the films at a constant velocity of 100 m/s. The potential energy, load, and average tilt angle of the
film molecules were monitored during the simulation.