is just a weak indication that the percentage is not equal to
3% (lower than 3%).
57. a. Test H
0
: m ¼ 10 vs. H
a
: m < 10
b. Because the P-value is .017 < .05, reject H
0
,
suggesting that the pens do not meet specifications.
c. Because the P-value is .045 > .01, do not reject H
0
,
suggesting there is no reason to say the lifetime is
inadequate.
d. Because the P-value is .0011, reject H
0
. There is good
evidence showing that the pens do not meet
specifications.
61. a. 98, .85, .43, .004, .0000002
b. .40, .11, .0062, .0000003
c. Because the null hypothesis will be rejected with high
probability, even with only slight departure from the
null hypothesis, it is not very useful to do a .01 level
test.
63. b. 36.61 c. yes
65. a. Sx
i
c b. yes
67. Yes, the test is UMP for the alternative H
a
: y > .5
because the tests for H
0
: y ¼ .5 vs. H
a
: y ¼ p
0
all
have the same form for any p
0
> .5.
69. b. .05
c. .04345, .05826; Because .04345 < .05, the test is not
unbiased.
d. .05114; not most powerful
71. b. The value of the test statistic is 3.041, so the P-value is
.081, compared to .089 for Exercise 55.
73. A sample size of 32 should suffice.
75. a. Test H
0
: m ¼ 2150 vs. H
a
: m > 2150
b. t ¼ð
x 2150Þ=ðs=
ffiffiffi
n
p
Þ c. 1.33 d. .101
e. Do not reject H
0
at the .05 level.
77. Because t ¼ .77 and the P-value is .23, there is no
evidence suggesting that coal increases the mean heat
flux.
79. Conclude that activation time is too slow at the .05 level,
but not at the .01 level.
81. A normal probability plot gives no reason to doubt the
normality assumption. Because the sample mean is 9.815,
giving t ¼ 4.75 and a (upper tail) P-value of .00007,
reject the null hypothesis at any reasonable level. The
true average flame time is too high.
83. Assuming normality, calculate t ¼ 1.70, which gives a
two tailed P-value of .102. Do not reject the null
hypothesis H
0
: m ¼ 1.75.
85. The P-value for a lower tail test is .0014 (normal
approximation, .0005), so it is reasonable to reject the
idea that p ¼ .75 and conclude that fewer than 75% of
mechanics can identify the problem.
87. Because t ¼ 6.43, giving an upper tail P-value of
.0000002, conclude that the population mean time
exceeds 15 minutes.
89. Because the P-value is .013 > .01, do not reject the null
hypothesis at the .01 level.
91. a. For the test of H
0
: m ¼ m
0
vs. H
a
: m > m
0
at level a,
reject H
0
if 2Sx
i
/m
0
w
2
a;2n
For the test of H
0
: m ¼ m
0
vs. H
a
: m < m
0
at level a,
reject H
0
if 2Sx
i
/m
0
w
2
1a;2n
For the test of H
0
: m ¼ m
0
vs. H
a
: m 6¼ m
0
at level a,
reject H
0
if 2Sx
i
/m
0
w
2
a=2;2n
or
if 2Sx
i
/m
0
w
2
1a=2;2n
b. Because Sx
i
¼ 737, the test statistic is 2Sx
i
/m
0
¼ 19.65, which gives a P-value of .52. There is no
reason to reject the null hypothesis.
93. a. yes
Chapter 10
1. a. .4; it doesn’t b. .0724, .269
c. Although the CLT implies that the distribution will be
approximately normal when the sample sizes are each
100, the distribution will not necessarily be normal
when the sample sizes are each 10.
3. Do not reject H
0
because z ¼ 1.76 < 2.33
5. a. H
a
says that the average calorie output for sufferers is
more than 1 cal/cm
2
/min below that for non-sufferers.
Reject H
0
in favor of H
a
because z ¼2.90 2.33
b. .0019 c. .819 d. .66
7. Yes, because z ¼ 1.83 1.645.
9. a.
x
y ¼ 6:2
b. z ¼ 1.14, two-tailed P-value ¼ .25, so do not reject
the null hypothesis that the population means are
equal.
c. No, the values are positive and the standard deviation
exceeds the mean.
d. 95% CI: (10.0, 29.8)
11. a. A 95% CI for the true difference, fast food mean – not
fast food mean is (219.6, 538.4)
b. The one-tailed P-value is .014, so reject the null
hypothesis of a 200-calorie difference at the .05
level, and conclude that yes, there is strong evidence.
13. 22. No.
15. b. It increases.
17. Because z ¼ 1.36, there is no reason to reject the
hypothesis of equal population means ( p ¼ .17).
19. Because z ¼ .59, there is no reason to conclude that the
population mean is higher for the no-involvement group
(p ¼ .28).
21. Because t ¼3.35 3.30 ¼ t
.001,42
, yes, there is
evidence that experts do hit harder.
23. b. No c. Because
|
t
|
¼
|
.38
|
< 2.228 ¼ t
.025,10
, no,
there is no evidence of a difference.
25. Because the one-tailed P-value is .005 .01, conclude at
the .01 level that the difference is as stated.
This could result in a type I error.
27. Yes, because t ¼ 2.08 with P-value ¼ .046.
29 b. (127.6, 202.0) c. 131.8
826 Chapter 10