
Environmental Encyclopedia 3
Overfishing
individuals left to reproduce and bring the population back to
the level it was the year before. Overfishing has a tremendous
negative impact on nontarget
species
as well. More than
half, and occasionally as much as 90%, of a catch may be
discarded, and this can adversely affect the
environment
by altering predator-prey ratios and adding excess
organic
waste
through the dumping of nearly 30 million tons of
dead or dying fish and shellfish overboard annually. Over-
fishing has also negatively impacted diving seabird, sea turtle,
and dolphin populations since these animals often get
trapped and killed in fishing nets. It is estimated that 44,000
albatrosses are killed each year by Japanese tuna fishermen,
and that, over the years, tuna purse seine nets in the Eastern
Tropical Pacific have caused the death of millions of
dol-
phins
.
The offshore waters are not regulated as are the coastal
waters of our continents, therefore several populations of
commercially important species have been overfished. Often,
fishermen simply try to catch as many fish as possible (as
fast as possible), because they believe that any fish left in the
water will be caught by someone else. The codfish industry of
the Atlantic coast of Canada and the United States had
been a productive fishery since the time of the early settlers,
hundreds of years ago. But with the introduction, in 1954,
of a new kind of highly industrialized fishing vessel, the
factory trawler, conditions changed for the cod population.
In 1968, exceeding the normal catch for the region by over
500,000 tons, 810,000 tons of cod were taken off Labrador
and the Grand Banks off Newfoundland. In the decade to
follow, the cod population declined to the point that the
number of spawning codfish off Newfoundland in 1977
showed a 94% decrease from the number in 1962. Another
species to show population decline due to overfishing is the
American shad, often referred to as the poor man’s
salmon
.
Harvested by Native Americans and the early colonists, the
shad fishery was supplying one of the most commercially
valuable fish to the region surrounding the
Chesapeake
Bay
during the 1800’s. Overfishing, combined with an in-
crease in
pollution
and the disruption of spawning runs by
the damming of rivers, took a fishery with an annual harvest
of nearly 18 million pounds at the turn of the century to
less than 2 million pounds in the 1970s.
A tragic example of the effect of overfishing is seen
at
Georges Bank
in the Atlantic Ocean. Georges Bank,
discovered by the Italian explorer Giovanni da Verrazano in
the early part of the 16th century, was named after St.
George by English settlers in 1605. Home to over 100 species
of fish, Georges Bank has been a historically significant site
of plentiful fishing for centuries. It is an ovoid embankment
that is about 75 miles (120 km) off of the coast of New
England. It encompasses an area 149 miles (240 km) in
length and 75 miles (120 km) in width, and is over 330 feet
1041
(100 meters) above the sea floor of the adjacent Gulf of
Maine. A bank, or shoal, is a shallow portion of an ocean
that is analogous to a plateau. Georges Bank is part of a
large range of shoals that extends from Newfoundland to
the edge of the North American continental shelf. Georges
Bank itself is larger than the state of New Jersey, and is an
extremely important breeding ground for cod, haddo! ck,
herring, flounder, lobster, and scallops. Its unique conditions
are formed by the mingling of two major Atlantic currents:
the cold Labrador current and the warm Gulf stream. The
mixing of nutrient-rich and well-oxygenated waters in com-
bination with good light penetration due to shallow depth
creates an ideal environment for
plankton
that is a vital
food source for young fish.
Known for its abundant fish supply, Georges Bank
was heavily fished for centuries. Early fisheries believed the
supply to be inexhaustible. The first documented conse-
quence of indiscriminate fishing was in 1850 when, after a
concentrated season of overfishing, a dramatic decline in
halibut numbers in Georges Bank threatened commerce.
The near
extinction
of halibut in this area occurred when
ocean fishing was still accomplished using relatively small
sailboats and handlines with baited hooks. After World War
II, colossal factory-sized fishing ships were created and new
large-scale fishing techniques were employed in Georges
Bank. Miles of
gill nets
and other efficient methods became
standard tools for trolling the bank. Fisheries from the
United States, the Soviet Union, Spain, Japan, and Germany
collected huge bounties from Georges Bank for decades.
Each modern ship could catch as much cod in a single hour
as an average boat from the 1600s could collect in an enti!
re season. The fishing industry boomed from the 1950s
through the 1970s, until it became apparent that even the
ocean had limits that could be surpassed.
In 1976, the United States passed the Magnuson Act
which established American authority to ban international
factory fishing in the Georges Bank area. The intention was
to protect and preserve fish stocks for the United States and
Canada. Rather than initiate
conservation
strategies for
managing the fish populations of Georges Bank, western
fisheries free from foreign competition in the area, advanced.
The New England Council, created by the Magnuson Act
to protect Georges Bank, was effectively controlled by fishing
industry interests that did little to address growing concerns
about dwindling supplies.
In 1994 the National Marine Fisheries Service esti-
mated a 40% decline in cod stocks in the Georges Bank area
that occurred over an alarmingly short four-year period.
Survey after survey found that the once abundant bank had
been stripped of every prime commercial fish species that
once filled its waters. As a result, that same year, fishing
was banned in a 9,600 square kilometer area of Georges