
photoresists results in the exposed-polymer regions becoming preferentially soluble
in the developing solution. Although early photolithographic applications used
negative tone photoresists exclusively, the organic matrices of these materials
caused swelling, which results in pattern distortion during development. In order
to reproduce line features below 3 mm present in today’s electronic devi ces, aqueous
base-soluble positive photoresists are most commonly employed. However, aqueous
negative tone photoresists have now been developed with line resolut ions below
1 mm.
[30]
As one can see from Eq. 13, decreasing the wavelength of exposure for photoli-
thography will directly improve the resulting line resolution. Table 4.2 lists the
wavelengths and optimum resolution values for various lithographic techniques.
Since 2002, IC fabrication has used 193-nm UV irradiation (ArF source) for
patterning. Photolithography using 157-nm (F
2
laser source) was to be instituted a
few years later to further progress the rapid miniaturization of ICs; however, it was
deemed too costly. That is, in addition to switching from atmospheric-pressure to
high-vacuum environments, new photoresists and masks would also need to be
designed.
R=
0:61l
NA
ð13Þ
where R is the resolution limit (line spacing capable of being resolved – smaller R is
better) and NA is the numerical aperture of the exposure tool (the light-gathering
power of a lens – discussed in more detail in Chapter 7).
Though decreasing the exposure wavelength improves line resolution, issues
associated with absorption will become increasingly problematic. The use of
extreme UV light (EUV), within the range of soft X-rays (ca. l ¼ 13.4 nm;
100 eV), has also been developed for IC fabrication. This was once touted to soon
replace 193-nm photolithography (Figure 4.43); however, the use of phase-shift
masks (Figure 4.44) and double-/multiple-exposure techniques
[31]
has extended the
193-nm exposure far beyond the original predictions. The EUV source is based on a
plasma generated from an IR laser that impinges upon gas-phase Xe clusters
expanding at supersonic speeds. Rather than conventional lenses, EUV also dictates
Table 4.2. Resolution Limits for Various Lithographic Techniques
Lithographic technique Exposure wavelength (nm) Resolution
Photolithography
a
mid-UV (MUV) 350–450 0.35–3 mm
Photolithography deep-UV (DUV) 248 0.25 mm
Photolithography deep-UV (DUV) 193 <30 nm
b
Photolithography extreme-UV (EUV) 13.5 <20 nm
Electron-beam lithography
c
ca.1 <10 nm
X-ray lithography
d
0.4–20 <30 nm
a
Using a standard chrome-on-glass photomask.
b
Using advanced photomask techniques such as phase-shift masks (PSMs, Figure 4.32).
c
Using a photomask of Si
3
N
4
membrane and Cr/W patterned regions.
d
Using a photomask of Si/Si
3
N
4
/SiC/BN membrane and Au/W patterned regions.
284 4 Semiconductors