
Growth and Characterization of ZnO Nano- and Microstuctures 311
as error bars in Fig. 9.16a . Compared to the linewidths of the WGMs, Eq. 9.1 for TM polarization
gives a very good description of the spectral position of the resonant modes.
9.4 Optical properties II: stimulated emission from ZnO microcrystals
In the last section we showed that micrometre-sized ZnO structures can be employed as optical
resonators are hence promising candidates for laser devices and should allow fundamental inves-
tigations of light–matter coupling. The microcrystal structures show a high photoluminescence
(PL) signal under low excitation conditions.
If ZnO is optically excited under high intensities, typically an additional peak arises in the ZnO
PL spectrum. This peak is most probably caused by an inelastic exciton–exciton scattering proc-
ess and exhibits a fi ne structure. The emitted photons have the energies [102] :
EE E
n
kT
nexx
b
B
1
13
2
2
⎛
⎝
⎜
⎜
⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟
⎟
⎟
⎟
(9.3)
where E
ex
is the energy of the free exciton luminescence, E
x
b
is the binding energy of the exci-
tons and k
B
T the thermal energy. The parameter n is the quantum number of the problem. The
respective peak is called P-band and in many cases stimulated emission related to this band can
be observed. Under even higher excitation, the carrier density in the sample increases and the
electron–hole plasma (EHP) peak at even lower energies than the P-band becomes observable.
A laser is a device emitting stimulated optical radiation. For practical purposes, one uses a cav-
ity for optical feedback. A ZnO microcrystal per se cannot be expected to act as such a cavity due
to the high losses caused by the short distance of the mirrors. The mirror loss for refl ectivities R
1
and R
2
in a cavity of length L is given by [103] :
α
21
12
LRR
ln .
(9.4)
The refl ectivity of the ZnO/air interface is approximately 0.2. For a 10 μ m cavity, Eq. 9.4 gives a
loss of 1600 cm
1
. In a real structure, other losses due to scattering and absorption will addition-
ally play a role. Typical gain reported for ZnO (150 cm
1
in [104] , 600 cm
1
in [105] ) cannot
overcome these losses. The observation of Fabry–Perot modes in lasing thus seems unlikely in
our structures. However, we will demonstrate stimulated emission as result of a single pass gain.
9.4.1 Experiments
Figure 9.19 shows a scheme of the set-up used for the PL and high excitation spectroscopy (HES)
measurements. It allows spatially resolved PL measurements and the observation of emitted
light from single microstructures. For PL, the excitation source was a continuous-wave He–Cd
Kimmon laser with a wavelength of 325 nm and a power of 20 mW. For HES measurements, a
pulsed Thales DIVA II Nd:YAG laser beam (266 nm, 10 ns, 20 Hz) is focused on the sample. The
energy per pulse is 2 mJ. Using these two lasers, the excitation intensity has been varied in a
range from 1 to 2500 kW/cm
2
. The angle of incidence of the pump beam is approximately 60 °
with respect to the surface normal as depicted in the inset of Fig. 9.19 . Excitation spots smaller
than the diameter of the pump laser beam are possible using a focusing lens. Furthermore, the
excitation intensity can be controlled by a refl ective Newport attenuator for high power lasers.
The light emitted from the sample can be defl ected into a digital camera by a movable mirror
making the set-up work as an optical microscope. If the mirror is removed, the emitted light is
focused onto an optical fused silica fi bre and directed to the monochromator. It is then spectrally
dispersed with a 2400 lines/mm grating (blaze 330 nm) and detected by a liquid nitrogen cooled
back-illuminated CCD camera. The set-up is diffraction limited and confocal and allows a spatial
resolution of 1 μ m.
CH009-I046325.indd 311CH009-I046325.indd 311 6/24/2008 3:05:23 PM6/24/2008 3:05:23 PM