(see Section 3.3.7). As for grain size distribution, it is always important to
recognise the resolution limits of any analytical method. These will clearly
affect the interpretation of the pore size distribution and the values of para-
meters that describe the pores.
A diagram similar to that used for crystal size distributions can be used (see
Section 3.3.7.2; Marsh, 1988b). In this graph the natural logarithm of the
population density is plotted against size, generally expressed as the equivalent
radius or diameter. As before population density must be distinguished clearly
from volume number density (see Section 3.3.7.2). This diagram is useful if the
pore population is generated by nucleation and growth in a similar way to
crystals. However, in many situations nucleation is instantaneous and hence
the Marsh model is not applicable.
Many authors have used simple frequency histograms to display pore size
distributions. The horizontal axis is either size as equivalent radius or volume
expressed linearly or in log 2 units (Toramaru, 1990). However, as was men-
tioned in Section 3.3.7, this is not a very good diagram if the data are sparse, as
they tend to be for the larger size classes. In this situation many classes will only
contain one or two pores or may be empty (e.g. Larsen et al., 2004). The eye
tends to glide over the empty classes, creating the impression that the number
of larger pores is greater than it is. This problem cannot be resolved by
increasing the width of classes as then the height of the histogram bar will
change. A better, and equally simple, diagram uses frequency density. The
frequency in each size class is divided by the width of the class. Larger classes
can then be wider, eliminating empty or sparse size classes that are just
artefacts of measurement.
Other distribution models can be verified by suitable diagrams in the same
way as for crystal size distributions (see Section 3.3.7). For example, Klug et al.
(2002) used a cumulative frequency diagram to verify if BSDs were lognormal
and a log–log diagram to determine if a power law (fractal) distribution was a
better approximation.
The connectedness of pores can also be quantified. It can be expressed in
terms of the number density (number per unit volume) of interconnected pores
against pore volume (Song et al., 2001). Pores are connected by pore throats
and the dimensions of such throats can also be expressed by a mean value and
size distribution.
7.4.2 Overall pore size parameters
The moments of the pore size distribution, M
0
, M
1
etc. can be calculated easily
and are simply related to the overall properties of the pores. These equations
7.4 Parameter values and display 227