
obvious appearance of treatment, most notably cockling. Liquid techniques can
function economically over a broad treatment range. The approach of Church in
the late 19th century was updated by Baynes-Cope in the mid-1960s [25]. This
followed his experimentation in 1961 with a magnesium methoxide solution
which, while quite effective, was impractical in terms of preparation and storage.
Independently, Richard Smith from the University of Chicago developed a process
that utilized a magnesium methoxide compound which was dissolved in a mixture
of methanol and chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) [26]. This overcame many of the prob-
lems associated with earlier approaches regarding stability and ease of use.
Ethanolate and propanolate of magnesium which are dissolved in the appro-
priate alcohol and a nonpolar halogenated hydrocarbon can also be used as deaci-
dification agents. By transformation of the magnesium alcoholate in the appro-
priate carbonates (alkoxy magnesium carbonate) using (dry) carbon dioxide, a fur-
ther improvement of the solubility and permanence could be reached.
13.3.2
History of Commercial Mass Deacidification
In the last 25 years some mass deacidification processes have been developed, by
national libraries and companies, which could not gain acceptance. A short de-
scription of the most important follows:
In contrast to procedures working with solvents, a vapor-phase approach offers
prospects for minimal preselection and maintenance of document integrity be-
cause no solvents are involved. At least one researcher likened this approach to a
“fountain of youth” among deacidification methods [27]. Gas-phase processes work
best on a substantial scale because the facilities characteristically have high capital
intensity.
Early attempts at gaseous deacidification included the work reported in 1962 by
Kathpalia at the Nehru Library in New Delhi, involving exposure of books to high
concentrations of ammonia [28]. The compound proved to be too weak a base to
neutralize completely strong acid and the ammonia buffer was highly imperma-
nent. At about the same time, Barrow working in the United States and Baynes-
Cope in England combined ammonia and short-chain amines, including butyla-
mine, diethylamine and piperidine, and observed similar results – a short term
alkalization that was reversed as the amine left the treated paper.
A more promising approach was advanced by Langwell who placed cyclohex-
ylamine carbamate impregnated sheets in books [29]. The active compound dif-
fuses into the book paper to neutralize acidity, but no alkaline reserve is estab-
lished and the neutralization is reversible. Finally, morpholine treatment was pro-
moted by Kusterer and others working at the Barrow Laboratory in 1977. Besides
the lack of permanence, significant discoloration was observed in the paper of
treated books. Kelly and Williams at the Library of Congress designed a mass
deacidification process in 1977 that utilizes diethyl zinc (DEZ) [30]. The compound
easily diffuses between the pages of closed books, neutralizing the acidity and
establishing a uniform, controllable reserve of zinc oxide.
13 Book and Paper Preservation482