canvassforsupportforthepreferredoption.Ihadprocrastinated,withthe
President’sagreement,becauseIdidnotwantto jeopardizetheprecarious
beginningsofournewChinapolicywithanissuethatwouldbeprovocative
withoutbeingcapableofresolution, andwouldinanyeventbeovertakenbythe
evolutionofourrelationswithPeking.
ItwasareflectiononthetheologicalnatureofourChinadebatethatmany
expertsstillregardedthe“solution”oftheUNissue,liturg ically,astheabsolute
preconditionofanyimprovementinourrelationswithPeking—apointthathad
notbeenmadeinanyChinesecommunicationinanychannel; indeed,noChines e
communicationevenraisedtheUNissue.UnabletoobtainaPresidentialruling,
theStateDepartmentsimplyputforwarditstheoreticalpositionpubliclytogeta
legupinthebureaucraticdebate.OnApril28,theDepartmentspokesman
declaredasourpositionthatsovereigntyoverTaiwanandthePescadoreswas
“anunsettledquestionsubjecttofutureinternationalresolution,”something
bothpartiesoftheChinadisputerejectedsincebothconsideredtheterritoriesas
partofthesovereignstateofChina.Thepurposeofthestatementwastoenable
ustolaythelegalbasisforadmittingPekingtotheUNwhileretainingaseatin
theGeneralAssemblyforTaipei.Tocomplicatemattersfurther,onApril29
SecretaryRogers,inLondonforaSEATOministerialmeeting,appearedon
televisiontoproclaimthatMao’sinvitationtoNixon,asreportedinLifemagazine
byEdgarSnow,was“fairlycasuallymade”;hedidnotbelieveitwas“aserious
invitation.”HewentontosaythatChina’sforeignpolicywas“expansionist”in
manyways;China’spolicyhadbeen“ratherparanoiac”towardtherestofthe
world;andifoureffortstoimproverelationswiththeUSSRandChinastimulated
theirfeud,thatwasa“dividend”—though,headded,notourobjective.ANixon
triptoChina,Rogersadded,followingthelinehisEastAsianBureauhadbeen
pressingforallalong,mightbepossible“downtheroadapiece,”butonly
providedthatChinadecidedtojointheinternationalcommunityinsome
unspecifiedwayandcomplied“withtherulesofinternationallaw.”
ThatRogersdidnotknowofourexchangesexcusedthisconfusiontosome
extent;itdidnotdiminishtheimpactofhisremarks.NixonandIwere
thunderstruck.WewereconcernedthatPekingmightconstrueRogers’s
statementsasourreplytoitsmessageorconcludethatwethoughtChinawas
susceptibletopressuredespiteitswarningsmonthsearliernottotreatits
openingtowardusasasignofweakness—astatementrarelymadebycountries