Migmatite is a composite, heterogeneous rock (the
Greek migma means mixture) on the outcrop scale that
consists of mafic metamorphic rock mingled with felsic
rock in the form of planar to folded and contorted
layers, criss-crossing veins, and irregular pods (Fig-
ures 11.24, 15.12, 15.13a, and 15.14). There may be
no sharp distinction between quartzo-feldspathic gneiss
and migmatite; hence labels such as migmatitic gneiss
and gneissic migmatite are frequently used. The richly
illustrated Mehnert (1968) shows the wide variety of
migmatites. The leucocratic component is sharply
bounded to gradational with the more mafic host schist,
gneiss, or amphibolite. In many migmatites, the leuco-
cratic leucosome is separated from the mesosome
(a descriptive term for intermediate rock) or paleo-
some (a genetic term for the “average” protolith), by a
more mafic selvage, or melanosome (Figures 15.13a
and 15.15).
The origin of migmatites has been the subject of
heated controversy since their first description by the
Finnish geologist J. J. Sederholm in 1907 (Ashworth,
1985). A bewildering terminology, partly descriptive
and partly genetic (such as mesosome versus paleo-
some), has grown during this debate. The origin of
migmatites seems to be linked in some way with their
typical occurrence in high-T sectors of regional meta-
morphic terranes where mineral assemblages define the
upper amphibolite facies (Figure 14.33). Under these
conditions, decomposition of muscovite (Figure 14.31)
and perhaps biotite liberates water that may be essen-
tial in creating local water-saturated conditions for
minimum-T partial melting just above the granite solidus
(Figures 5.24–5.26; see also Section 11.6.1 and Figure
11.21, top). Thus, the felsic leucosome in migmatites
can be generated by in situ partial melting and segre-
gation from the paleosome, the melanosome being a
mafic residue. Mass-balance investigations disclosing
complementary compositions support this closed sys-
tem origin, as does the presence of euhedral, slightly
zoned plagioclases of magmatic character in some leu-
cosomes. Nonetheless, a complementary compositional
relation does not always exist and in such cases it is
argued that leucosomes could have been intruded as
magmas from a more distant source, despite the neces-
sarily pervasiveness of the injections. Another proposed
origin consistent with the pervasive heterogeneity of
migmatites and the more or less complementary com-
position of leucosome and melanosome with the paleo-
some is metamorphic differentiation; mafic and felsic
components segregate via diffusion. Exactly how this
ordering and decrease in entropy of the system can
occur spontaneously is a puzzle. Yet another origin
involves metasomatic transformation of the parent
rock by introduction of felsic components via pene-
trating fluids. The origin of migmatites has yet to be
resolved. They may, in fact, be polygenetic, originating
Petrography of Metamorphic Rocks: Fabric, Composition, and Classification
457
quartz grains may be still evident in typically low-grade
slates (Figure 14.25b). Weakly foliated metagraywackes
(Figure 14.17b) are commonly interlayered with slates,
as are various metavolcanic rocks such as greenstones
and metatuffs that have relict magmatic fabrics. Slates
are purple or red (oxidized, with abundant hematite),
green (chlorite) and, most commonly, gray to black
(reduced, with graphite). Some of the latter have
porphyroblasts of euhedral pyrite. Low-temperature
recrystallization of slate in contact aureoles creates
poikiloblasts of cordierite, andalusite, or mica, forming
spotted slates (Figures 14.10 and 14.25c); locally,
altered cordierites preferentially weather out, leaving
pits.
Phyllite is also aphanitic, but because of a slightly
coarser grain size than slate, has a lustrous or silky
sheen on foliation surfaces. Phyllites are transitional
between slates and schists and share associations and
properties of both.
Widespread schists are phaneritic, commonly
porphyroblastic, and have a weak to well developed
segregation layering of felsic and mafic material that
usually parallels and augments the already strong lepido-
blastic fabric (Figure 14.17d). Lineation is commonly
expressed by elongate segregations of contrasting min-
erals (Figure 15.9) or by folds and wrinkles in the foli-
ation. Relative to slates and phyllites, coarser-grained
schists have better developed imposed metamorphic
fabrics that have modified and usually erased relict
magmatic and sedimentary features. Compositional
layering in schists may have originated by metamorphic
differentiation in addition to or in lieu of inherited
bedding.
All chemical classes are represented in schists,
but pelitic and quartzo-feldspathic compositions with
abundant micas and chlorites are most common.
Diagnostic minerals indicate low- to intermediate-
grade conditions of the subgreenschist, greenschist,
blueschist, and amphibolite facies.
15.2.3 Weakly Foliated Rocks
The typically higher grade of metamorphism of a
phaneritic gneiss is evident in the low modal propor-
tion, or absence, of micas and chlorite. Grains of major
rock-forming minerals, mostly quartz and feldspar, are
more equant. Foliation ranges from barely perceptible to
conspicuous and is expressed by sparse or imperfectly
aligned platy minerals, parallelism of augen in augen
gneiss (Figures 14.38a and 15.7), flattened mineral
aggregates (Figures 15.6 and 15.13b), or mechanically
passive compositional layering (Figure 15.5; see also
Figure 19.24a). Mafic layers may be more strongly foli-
ated where there are lepidoblastic biotites or decussate
amphiboles, whereas alternating felsic layers tend to be
granoblastic. Abundant field photographs in Passchier
et al. (1990) illustrate the character of gneisses.