continental crust is not everywhere vertically upward
because a large component of geothermal water and
advecting water around shallow magmatic intrusions is
meteoric. Moreover, the pattern of fluid infiltration in
some contact metamorphic aureoles indicates subhor-
izontal channelized flow in highly permeable layers.
Fluid flow can be focused in fault zones where a
different sort of pressure gradient is produced by dila-
tancy pumping. As stress builds up immediately prior
to faulting, rocks experience a perceptible increase in
volume (dilatancy) as a result of pervasive microcrack-
ing. The opening cracks are local sites of reduced pres-
sure and consequently suck any nearby fluid into them.
But once failure occurs, stress is released, microcracks
collapse, and fluid is driven out. This pumping action
and other possible mechanisms may cause fluid flow in
ductile shear zones (marked by mylonite) as well as
more brittle faults (Ord and Oliver, 1997).
It is entirely possible that fluid flow would be
limited in metamorphic rocks without the effects of
reaction- and deformation-enhanced permeability.
16.8 METASOMATISM
Most metamorphic reactions involve movement of
ions on the scale of consuming reactant and growing
product grains. However, the foregoing pages have
demonstrated that large-scale fluid movement occurs
in metamorphic terranes. In most instances, these
infiltrating fluids are likely to react to some degree with
the rocks through which they flow. The term meta-
somatism is conventionally applied where the distance
between the source and sink of the transported mater-
ial is more than the scale of individual grains and there
is a significant change in the bulk chemical and modal
composition of the protolith. (Compare cryptic meta-
somatism in mantle rocks, Section 11.2.2.) Metasomat-
ism has been placed in a thermodynamic context since
the middle twentieth century by J. B. Brady, G. W.
Fisher, D. S. Korzhinskii, J. B. Thompson, and others.
For reviews see Barton et al. (1991) and Winter (2001,
Chapter 30).
Metasomatism can be driven by differences in
chemical potential between adjacent compositionally
contrasting rock volumes and accomplished by diffu-
sion at relatively high T over prolonged periods of
time. An example is the so-called bimetasomatism at
contacts between silicate and carbonate-bearing rock
where, to a first approximation, Si has moved from the
former into the latter and Ca in the opposite direction.
Most metasomatism, however, is related to infiltration
of fluids into highly permeable rocks. This is especially
common in, but by no means restricted to, contact
metamorphic aureoles and oceanic ridges.
Interpretations of metasomatic rocks generally must
deal with three unknowns: the character of the protolith,
the gains and losses of elements (what chemical
species were mobile versus immobile, and which were
conserved), and the metasomatic process (whether
constant volume or not). Without some independent
information, the composition of the metasomatic rock
alone cannot provide answers to all of these unknowns.
It is commonly assumed that certain chemical con-
stituents remained immobile during metasomatism,
such as Al
2
O
3
, TiO
2
, and high-field-strength trace
elements (Figure 2.20), but this assumption can be a
pitfall unless tested and evaluated in some way. Field
relations and rock fabric can provide constraints in
some cases, as in resolving the long-standing dilemma
regarding serpentinization of ultramafic rocks (Section
15.2.7). In contact metamorphic aureoles, unlike re-
gional terranes, distinct rock layers can often be traced
along their strike from unaltered protoliths a kilometer
or less from the intrusion into metasomatized rocks
nearer the magmatic contact.
Some petrologists have argued for removal of as
much as 20 wt.% of the total nonvolatile mass of pelitic
rocks during Barrovian regional metamorphism. How-
ever, most believe that less than 3 wt.% of nonvolatiles
are lost and, to a first approximation, metamorphism
is isochemical in terms of nonvolatile elements but
metasomatic in terms of perfectly mobile volatiles. In
this controversy, it is difficult to accurately evaluate the
amount of mass transferred out of a regional terrane
because of the heterogeneity of the protoliths and their
uncertain initial chemical compositions (Walther et al.,
1995; Vernon, 1998). Another impediment is how to
devise a rigorous sampling plan that can accurately and
reliably test the amount of transfer.
16.8.1 Ion Exchange Reactions in Open
Metasomatic Systems
Most rock-forming silicate minerals and their chemical
components are only very slightly soluble in H
2
O–CO
2
fluids; thus, very large volumes are required to trans-
port significant masses of dissolved silicates, as dis-
cussed above for quartz. Solubilities depend on the
composition of the fluid, P, and T (Labotka, 1991).
Greater Cl concentrations in aqueous fluids can pro-
mote greater solubilities, especially for alkalies (Na,
K, Rb). Salts of Cl
, SO
4
2
, and CO
2
3
, such as KCl,
CaSO
4
, and Na
2
CO
3
, have significantly greater solubil-
ities in aqueous fluids than silicates and consequently
greater amounts of these materials can be transported
by fluid flow. As carbonates, halides, and sulfates are
the very materials generally found in fluid inclusions in
metamorphic minerals (Special Interest Box 16.3), they
are likely to have been involved in the solid–fluid reac-
tions occurring during metamorphism.
Mineral components can have a source in the rocks
through which fluids percolate, dissolving or leaching
out the more soluble, mobile components. Or the
504 Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology