
Apago PDF Enhancer
56.2 If the populations in question comprised a source-sink metapopulations,
then the lack of immigration into the sink populations would, most likely, eventu-
ally result in the extinction of those populations. The source populations would
likely then increase their geographic ranges.
56.3 It depends upon the initial sizes of the populations in question; a small
population with a high survivorship rate will not necessarily grow faster than a
large population with a lower survivorship rate.
56.4 A species with high levels of predation would likely exhibit an earlier age
at rst reproduction and shorter inter-birth intervals in order to maximize its
tness under the selective pressure of the predation. On the other hand, species
with few predators have the luxury of waiting until they are more mature before
reproducing and can increase the inter-birth interval (and thus invest more in each
offspring) because their risk of early mortality is decreased.
56.5 Many different factors might affect the carrying capacity of a population.
For example, climate changes, even on a relatively small scale, could have large
effects on carrying capacity by altering the available water and vegetation, as well as
the phenology and distribution of the vegetation. Regardless of the type of change
in the environment, however, most populations will move toward carrying capacity;
thus, if the carrying capacity is lowered, the population should decrease, and if the
carrying capacity is raised, the population should increase.
56.6 A given population can experience both positive and negative density-de-
pendent effects, but not at the same time. Negative density-dependent effects, such
as low food availability or high predation pressure, would decrease the population
size. On the other hand, positive density-dependent effects, such as is seen with the
Allee effect, results in a rapid increase in population size. Since a population cannot
both increase and decrease at the same time, the two cannot occur concurrently.
However, the selective pressures on a population are on a positive-negative con-
tinuum, and the forces shaping population size can not only vary in intensity but
can also change direction from negative to positive or positive to negative.
56.7 The two are closely tied together, and both are extremely important if the
human population is not to exceed the Earth’s carrying capacity. As population
growth increases, the human population approaches the planet’s carrying capacity;
as consumption increases, the carrying capacity is lowered—thus, both trends must
be reversed.
INQUIRY QUESTIONS
Page 1164 Very possibly. How fast a lizard runs is a function of its body
temperature. Researchers have shown that lizards in shaded habitats have lower
temperatures and thus lower maximal running speeds. In such circumstances,
lizards often adopt alternative escape tactics that rely less on rapidly running away
from potential predators.
Page 1169 Because of their shorter generation times, smaller species tend
to reproduce more quickly, and thus would be able to respond more quickly to
increased resources in the environment.
Page 1171 Based on the survivorship curve of meadow grass, the older the
plant, the less likely it is to survive. It would be best to choose a plant that is very
young to ensure the longest survival as a house plant. A survivorship curve that is
shaped like a Type I curve, in which most individuals survive to an old age and then
die would also lead you to select a younger plant. A type III survivorship curve, in
which only a few individuals manage to survive to an older age, would suggest the
selection of a middle-aged plant that had survived the early stages of life since it
would also be more likely to survive to old age.
Page 1172 It depends on the situation. If only large individuals are likely to
reproduce (as is the case in some territorial species, in which only large males can
hold a territory), then a few large offspring would be favored; alternatively, if body
size does not affect survival or reproduction, then producing as many offspring as
possible would maximize the representation of an individual’s genes in subsequent
generations. In many cases, intermediate values are favored by natural selection.
Page 1174 Because when the population is below carrying capacity, the popula-
tion increases in size. As it approaches the carrying capacity, growth rate slows
down either from increased death rates, decreased birthrates, or both, becoming
zero as the population hits the carrying capacity. Similarly, populations well above
the carrying capacity will experience large decreases in growth rate, resulting either
from low birthrates or high death rates, that also approach zero as the population
hits the carrying capacity.
Page 1175 There are many possible reasons. Perhaps resources become limited,
so that females are not able to produce as many offspring. Another possibility is
that space is limited so that, at higher populations, individuals spend more time in
interactions with other individuals and squander energy that otherwise could be
invested in producing and raising more young.
Page 1176 The answer depends on whether food is the factor regulating popu-
lation size. If it is, then the number of young produced at a given population size
would increase and the juvenile mortality rate would decrease. However, if other
factors, such as the availability of water or predators, regulated population size,
then food supplementation might have no effect.
Page 1177 If hare population levels were kept high, then we would expect lynx
populations to stay high as well because lynx populations respond to food avail-
ability. If lynx populations were maintained at a high level, we would expect hare
populations to remain low because increased reproduction of hares would lead to
increased food for the lynxes.
Page 1179 If human populations are regulated by density-dependent fac-
tors, then as the population approaches the carrying capacity, either birthrates
will decrease or death rates will increase, or both. If populations are regulated by
density-independent factors, then if environmental conditions change, then either
both rates will decline, death rates will increase, or both.
Page 1179 The answer depends on whether age-speci c birth and death rates
stay unchanged. If they do, then the Swedish distribution would remain about the
same. By contrast, because birthrates are far outstripping death rates, the Kenyan
distribution will become increasingly unbalanced as the bulge of young individuals
enter their reproductive years and start producing even more offspring.
Page 1181 Both are important causes and the relative importance of the two
depends on which resource we are discussing. One thing is clear: The world can-
not support its current population size if everyone lived at the level of resource
consumption of people in the United States.
UNDERSTAND
1. b 2. c 3. a 4. b 5. d 6. b 7. c
APPLY
1. d 2. c 3. b 4. c
SYNTHESIZE
1. The genetic makeup of isolated populations will change over time based on
the basic mechanisms of evolutionary change; for example, natural selection,
mutation, assortative mating, and drift. These same processes affect the
genetic makeup of populations in a metapopulation, but the outcomes are
likely to be much more complicated. For example, if immigration between a
source and a sink population is very high, then local selection in a sink
population may be swamped by the regular ow of individuals carrying alleles
of lower tness from a source population where natural selection may not be
acting against those alleles; divergence might be slowed or even stopped
under some circumstances. On the other hand, if sinks go through repeated
population declines such that they often are made up of a very small number
of individuals, then they may lose considerable genetic diversity due to drift.
If immigration from source populations is greater than zero but not large,
these small populations might begin to diverge substantially from other
populations in the metapopulation due to drift. The difference is that in the
metapopulation, such populations might actually be able to persist and
diverge, rather than just going extinct due to small numbers of individuals
and no ability to be rescued by neighboring sources.
2. The probability that an animal lives to the next year should decline with age
(Note that in Figure 55.11, all the curves decrease with age) so the cost of
reproduction for an old animal would, all else being equal, be lower than for a
young animal. The reason is that the cost of reproduction is measured by
changes in tness. Imagine a very old animal that has almost no chance in
surviving to another reproductive event; it should spend all its effort on a
current reproductive effort since its future success is likely to be zero anyway.
3. If offspring size does not affect offspring quality, then it is in the parent’s
interest to produce absolutely as many small offspring as possible. In doing
so, it would be maximizing its tness by increasing the number of related
individuals in the next generation.
4. By increasing the mean generation time (increasing the age at which an
individual can begin reproducing; age at rst reproduction), keeping all else
equal, one would expect that the population growth rate would be reduced.
That comes simply from the fact of reducing the number of individuals that
are producing offspring in the adult age classes; lower population birth rates
would lead to a reduced population growth rate. As to which would have a
larger in uence, that is hard to say. If the change in generation time
(increased age at rst reproduction) had an overall larger effect on the total
number of offspring an individual female had than a reduced fecundity at any
age, then population growth rate would probably be more sensitive to the
appendix A
A-31
rav32223_appx_A1-A34.indd A-31rav32223_appx_A1-A34.indd A-31 12/7/09 5:02:49 PM12/7/09 5:02:49 PM