
Apago PDF Enhancer
be introduced—it is the ultimate source of all variation. Because it is a relatively
rare event, mutation by itself is not a strong agent of allele frequency change; how-
ever, in concert with other mechanisms, especially natural selection, it can drasti-
cally change the allele frequencies in a population. Gene ow can introduce new al-
leles into a population from another population of the same species, thus changing
the allele frequency within both the recipient and donor populations. Genetic drift
is the random, chance factor of evolution—while the results of genetic drift can be
negligible in a large population, small populations can see drastic changes in allele
frequency due to this agent. Finally, nonrandom mating results in populations
varying from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium not by changing allele frequencies but
by changing genotype frequencies—nonrandom mating reduces the proportion of
heterozygotes in a population.
20.4 Reproductive success relative to other individuals within an organism’s
population is referred to as that organism’s tness. Its tness is determined by its
longevity, mating frequency, and the number of offspring it produces for each mat-
ing. None of these factors is always the most important in determining reproduc-
tive success—instead it is the cumulative effects of all three factors that determines
an individual’s reproductive success. For example, an individual that has a very long
life span but mates only infrequently might have lower tness than a conspeci c
that lives only half as long but mates more frequently and with greater success. As
seen with the water strider example in this section, traits that are favored for one
component of tness, say, for example, longevity, may be disadvantageous for other
components of tness, say, lifetime fecundity.
20.5 The dynamics among the different evolutionary mechanisms are very
intricate, and it is often dif cult, if not impossible, to discern which direction each
process is operating within a population—it is much easier to simply see the nal
cumulative effects of the various agents of evolutionary change. However, there
are cases in which more than one evolutionary process will operate in the same
direction, with the resulting population changing, or evolving, more rapidly than it
would have under only one evolutionary mechanism. For example, mutation may
introduce a bene cial allele into a population; gene ow could then spread the new
allele to other populations. Natural selection will favor this allele within each popu-
lation, resulting in relatively rapid evolutionary adaptation of a novel phenotype.
20.6 In a population wherein heterozygotes had the lowest tness, natural selec-
tion should favor both homozygous forms. This would result in disruptive selec-
tion, and a bimodal distribution of traits within the population. Over enough time,
it could lead to a speciation event.
20.7 Directional selection occurs when one phenotype has an adaptive advantage
over other phenotypes in the population, regardless of its relative frequency
within the population. Frequency-dependent selection, on the other hand, results
when either a common (positive frequency-dependent selection) or rare (nega-
tive frequency-dependent selection) has a selective advantage simply by virtue of
its commonality or rarity. In other words, if a mutation introduces a novel allele
into a population, directional selection may result in evolution because the allele is
advantageous, not because it is rare.
20.8 Wild guppies have to balance natural selection, which, in the presence of a
predator such as the pike cichlid, would tend to favor drab coloration, with sexual
selection, wherein females prefer brightly colored males. Thus, in low-predation
environments the male guppies tend to be brightly colored whereas in high-preda-
tion environments they are drably colored. Background color matching is a form of
camou age used by many species to avoid predation; again, however, in many cases
this example of natural selection runs counter to sexual selection—males want to
be inconspicuous to predators but attractive to potential mates. For example, to test
the effects of predation on background color matching in a species of butter y, one
might raise captive populations of butter ies with a normal variation in coloration.
After a few generations, add natural predators to half of the enclosures. After
several generations, one would expect the butter ies in the predatory environment
to have a high degree of background color matching in order to avoid predation,
while the non-predatory environment would have promoted brightly-colored
individuals where color would correlate with mating success.
20.9 Pleiotropic effects occur with many genes; in other words, a single gene
has multiple effects on the phenotype of the individual. Whereas natural selection
might favor a particular aspect of the pleiotropic gene, it might select against
another aspect of the same gene; thus, pleiotropy often limits the degree to which a
phenotype can be altered by natural selection. Epistasis occurs when the expression
of one gene is controlled or altered by the existence or expression of another gene.
Thus, the outcome of natural selection will depend not just on the genotype of one
gene, but the other genotype as well.
INQUIRY QUESTIONS
Page 399 In the example of Figure 20.3, the frequency of the recessive white
genotype is 0.16. The remaining 84 cats (out of 100) in the population are ho-
mozygous or heterozygous black. If the 16 white cats died, they will not contribute
recessive white genes to the next generation. Only heterozygous black cats will
produce white kittens in a 3:1 ratio of black to white. Homozygous × homozygous
black and homozygous × heterozygous black cats will have all black kittens. Since
there are 36 homozygous black cats and 48 heterozygous black cats, with a new
total of 84 cats, the new frequency of homozygous black cats is 36/84 or 43%, with
the heterozygous black cats now comprising 57% of the population. If p
2
= 0.43,
then p = 0.65 (approximately), then 1–p = q, and q = 0.35. The frequency of white
kittens in the next generation, q
2
, is 0.12 or 12%.
Page 405 Differential predation might favor brown toads over green toads,
green toads might be more susceptible to disease, or green toads might be less able
to tolerate variations in climate, among other possibilities.
Page 406 Since the intermediate-sized water strider has the highest level of t-
ness, it would be expected that the intermediate size would become more prevalent
in the population. If the number of eggs laid per day was not affected by body size,
the small water striders would be favored because of their tendency to live longer
than their larger counterparts.
Page 407 Yes. The frequency of copper tolerance will decrease as distance from
the mine increases.
Page 411 The proportion of ies moving toward light (positive phototropism)
would again begin to increase in successive generations.
Page 411 The distribution of birth weights in the human population would
expand somewhat to include more babies of higher and lower birth weights.
Page 413 Guppy predators evidently locate their prey using visual cues. The
more colorful the guppy, the more likely it is to be seen and thus the more likely it
will become prey.
Page 414 Thoroughbred horse breeders have been using selective breeding for
certain traits over many decades, effectively removing variation from the popula-
tion of thoroughbred horses. Unless mutation produces a faster horse, it remains
unlikely that winning speeds will improve.
UNDERSTAND
1. a 2. b 3. d 4. a 5. d 6. a 7. d
APPLY
1. d 2. d 3. a
SYNTHESIZE
1. The results depend on coloration of guppies increasing their conspicuousness
to predators such that an individual’s probability of survival is lower than if it
was a drab morph. In the laboratory it may be possible to conduct trials in
simulated environments; we would predict, based on the hypothesis of
predation, that the predator would capture more of the colorful morph than
the drab morph when given access to both. Design of the simulated
environment would obviously be critical, but results from such an experi-
ment, if successful, would be a powerful addition to the work already
accomplished.
2. On the large lava ows, where the background is almost entirely black, those
individuals with black coloration within a population will have a selective
advantage because they will be more cryptic to predators. On the other hand, on
small ows, which are disrupted by light sand and green plants, dark individuals
would be at an adaptive disadvantage for the same reason. You can read more
about this in chapter 21 (21.2); the black peppered moths had an advantage on
the trees lacking lichen, but a disadvantage on lichen-covered trees.
3. Ultimately, genetic variation is produced by the process of mutation.
However, compared with the speed at which natural selection can reduce
variation in traits that are closely related to tness, mutation alone cannot
account for the persistence of genetic variation in traits that are under strong
selection. Other processes can account for the observation that genetic
variation can persist under strong selection. They include gene ow.
Populations are often distributed along environmental gradients of some
type. To the extent that different environments favor slightly different
variants of phenotypes that have a genetic basis, gene ow among areas in the
habitat gradient can introduce new genetic variation or help maintain existing
variation. Similarly, just as populations frequently encounter different
selective environments across their range (think of the guppies living above
and below the waterfalls in Trinidad), a single population also encounters
variation in selective environments across time (oscillating selection). Traits
favored this year may not be the same as those favored next year, leading to a
switching of natural selection and the maintenance of genetic variation.
appendix A
A-11
rav32223_appx_A1-A34.indd A-11rav32223_appx_A1-A34.indd A-11 11/30/09 6:36:00 PM11/30/09 6:36:00 PM