
600 Section VII • Pancreas
STEP 5: PEARLS AND PITFALLS
◆ As stated before, we advocate several precepts in arriving at the decision to proceed to
intervention.
◆ We particularly point out the signifi cance of time since development of the pseudocyst. The
literature on nonoperative modalities often describes interventions earlier than 4 weeks after
the initial event. The reason to avoid such a decision early is that the texture of the pseudo-
cyst will be unsuitable for holding a suture. We further believe that a percentage of these
patients will have complete resolution of the pseudocyst if given enough time to do so.
◆ Once the decision is made to proceed to intervention, we advocate obtaining pancreatic
ductal anatomy defi ned by either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). We have developed a system to
categorize the ductal changes seen in patients with pseudocyst; and type II (stricture),
type III (complete obstruction), and type IV (chronic pancreatitis) are likely best managed
by surgery, whereas type I (normal duct) is ideally suited to nonoperative interventions.
◆ We advocate cystojejunostomy and infrequently use cystoduodenostomy.
◆ Be prepared that some pseudocysts will be diffi cult to locate during operation. Intraopera-
tive ultrasound can be very helpful in this situation. If in doubt, always aspirate with a fi ne
needle before attempting to incise the wall of the presumed pseudocyst.
◆ We have published the observation that persistent fl uid collections after acute necrotizing
pancreatitis are often rigid-walled and irregular in contour. These have been called “orga-
nized pancreatic necrosis,” although the terminology is still evolving. Because of the rigid
wall, these fl uid collections will not collapse when drained. In our experience, this has re-
sulted in a higher frequency of postoperative infection and in a prolonged period before all
symptoms resolve. If you are managing such patients, the radiographs will always be read
as pseudocyst, and the surgeon must be prepared to make that distinction based on the his-
tory of each individual patient.
SELECTED REFERENCES
1. Nealon WH, Walser E: Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancre-
atic pseudocysts (surgery vs. percutaneous drainage). Ann Surg 2002;235:751-758.
2. Nealon WH, Walser E: Duct drainage alone is suffi cient in the operative management of pancreatic pseu-
docysts in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2003;237:614-622.
3. Nealon WH, Bhutani M, Riall TS, et al: A unifying concept: Pancreatic ductal anatomy both predicts and
determines the major complications resulting from pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:790-799.