
is chapter is about the psychology of constructive visual thinking in
the service of design. In addressing this subject we will encounter a num-
ber of fundamental questions. What is the diff erence between seeing and
imagining? What is the diff erence between the visual thinking that occurs
when we are making a sandwich, the visual thinking involved when we are
reading a map, and the visual thinking we do when we are designing an
advertising poster, a painting, or a web site?
Although creative visual thinking can be almost infi nitely varied, studies
of designers, artists, and scientists have identifi ed some common elements
no matter what the tasks. We begin with a generalized view of the steps
involved in the stages of the creative process.
Step 1—The visual concept is formed: Depending on the application, a graphic idea
may be very free and imaginative or very stereotyped. An art director doing design for an advertising firm
may be open to almost any new visual concept, so long as it can be somehow linked to the product and
yield a positive association. Conversely, an architect designing an apartment building on a fixed budget is
likely to have his visual imagination constrained to a small set of conventional alternatives. In either case
the initial concept may be quite abstract and not particularly graphical. A “ three-story, L-shaped building
with 12 units ” might be sufficient in the case of the architects.
Step 2—Externalization: A loose scribble is drawn on paper to externalize the concept and
provide a starting point for design refinement.
Step 3—The constructive critique: The scribble is visually critiqued; some elements are
visually tested. The designer performs a kind of informal cognitive task analysis, executing a series of visual
queries to determine if the design meets requirements. As part of the process, new meanings may be bound
with the external imagery and potential additions imagined.
Step 4—Consolidation and extension: The original scribble is modified. Faint existing lines
may be modified or strengthened, consolidating the aspect of the design they represent. New lines may be
added. Other lines may be erased or may simply recede as other visual elements become stronger.
MENTAL IMAGERY
From the 1980s, two main theories of mental imagery have dominated.
One, theory, championed by Zenon Pylyshyn, holds that mental imagery
is purely symbolic and non spatial.
Spatial ideas are held as logical prop-
ositions such as “ the cup is on the table ” or “ the picture is to the left of
the door. ” According to this view there is no spatial representation in the
brain in the sense of patterns of neural activation having some spatial cor-
respondence to the arrangement of the objects in space.
e second view, championed by Stephen Kosslyn, holds that mental
imagery is constructed using the same neurological apparatus responsible
for normal seeing.
ese phantom images are constructed in the spatial
neural maps that represent the visual fi eld in various areas of the visual
Z. Pylyshyn. 1973. What the mind ’ s
eye tells the mind ’ s brain: A critique of
mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin.
80: 1–25.
S. Kosslyn and J.R. Pomeranz. 1977.
Imagery, propositions, and the form
of internal representations. Cognitive
Psychology. 9: 52–76 .
148
CH08-P370896.indd 148CH08-P370896.indd 148 1/24/2008 6:25:47 PM1/24/2008 6:25:47 PM