308
about a reappraisal of the position of Judaism
and concepts of Jewishness, three of which are
considered here. First, the contemporary cri-
sis in Republican institutions and ideals, the
breakdown in traditional forms of political
mobilization, and the re-emergence of ethnic
identities, has led to new forms of Jewish self-
perception and new directions for political ac-
tion. Less and less reticent about expressing
their difference, Jews are now just as likely to
fight anti-semitism on ethnic lines (that is, as
Jews) as on the traditional Republican lines of
the Rights of Man (that is, as human beings).
The robust challenge to revisionist histories of
the war and to the latent (and often overt) anti-
semitism of the Front National demonstrates
a greater willingness, especially among the
generation of Jews born after the war, to reaf-
firm the Jewish presence in French history and
in contemporary France. Hence, the infamous
statement by Jean-Marie Le Pen that the Holo-
caust represented only a ‘detail’ in the history
of the war and the desecration of Jewish graves
in Carpentras in 1990 were both met by high-
profile campaigns to mobilize popular support
behind opposition to anti-semitism.
Second, the betrayal of the Republican con-
tract by the Vichy regime and the continuing
refusal (until relatively recently) of political
leaders to acknowledge the complicity be-
tween France and the Holocaust have contrib-
uted to a loss of faith in the universalist egali-
tarianism of Republicanism, and the desire to
be more assertive in protecting Jewish inter-
ests. The issue of war crimes in the 1980s and
1990s is, in part, a reflection of this desire: the
pursuit (by the lawyer Serge Klarsfeld and oth-
ers) of the Nazi Klaus Barbie and the French
collaborators Paul Touvier, René Bousquet
and Maurice Papon not only sought to bring
to justice those who had committed crimes
against humanity, but also aimed to challenge
established myths about French protection of
Jews during the war.
Third, the Holocaust itself has become, for
many, the major determinant of Jewish identity
and has therefore replaced the connections be-
tween Jews and the Enlightenment tradition of
modernity as the central definer of Jewish his-
tory in France. Much cultural output by Jews
since the war (notably that of Paul Celan,
Edmond Jabès, Claude Lanzmann, Emmanuel
Lévinas, Patrick Modiano and Elie Wiesel) has
inevitably dealt with questions of survival and
loss, memory, history, identity and representa-
tion deriving from the experience of the Holo-
caust.
For a number of French writers and phi-
losophers (Maurice Blanchot, Hélène Cixous,
Jacques Derrida, Jean-François Lyotard) Jew-
ish experience of the Holocaust has been de-
veloped into a generalized critique of the
project of modernity. The term ‘Jew’, inextri-
cably linked to Auschwitz, is employed alle-
gorically to signify the failure of the modern
project of assimilation or eradication of the
other, and the postmodern impossibility of the
representation of truth, presence and reality.
‘Jew’ is therefore an affirmation of all that was
stigmatized in the age of modernity, including
otherness, difference and a non-essentialist
concept of unrooted and diasporic identity.
Here the specificity of real Jews, Jewish his-
tory and identity is replaced by the term ‘Jew’
as a sign of ‘otherness’ and postmodern flux.
Hence, Judaism and Jewishness in France
today must be seen in the context of both wider
historical processes and contemporary devel-
opments. In today’s climate of a crisis of as-
similation and a decline in universal values,
Judaism and Jewishness are more overtly
particularistic, fighting their corner to reaffirm
their past and present existence. Like other
ethnicized groups today, Jews are caught be-
tween two extremes: on the one hand, fixed
and monolithic versions of difference and his-
tory; and on the other, more flexible and plu-
ralistic notions of difference and history in
which Jewishness is not only itself seen as prob-
lematic (for example, the distinction within the
Jewish community between Sephardi and
Ashkenazi traditions), but constitutes only one
aspect of a multilayered identity. Although
poles apart in terms of identity-formation, both
these positions have at least one thing in com-
mon: the view that Jews are not simply deter-
mined from the outside (through the look of
the non-Jew or the anti-semite, as Jean-Paul
Judaism