..
60
|
Frank Oldfield
..
England (e.g. Oldfield 1963). Such long-term records of recurrent recovery suggest
that the forest ecosystems of these regions, hence the soils also, have been remark-
ably resilient (sensu Lal 1997) in the face of repeated phases of deforestation. This is
despite the fact that several pollen diagrams from the north of England suggest that
the area deforested during Late Iron Age and Romano-British times, between
around 2500 and 1500 years BP, was as extensive as during the peak deforestation
in the 17th century (Oldfield and Statham 1965; Dumayne-Peaty and Barber 1998;
Wimble et al. 2000; Oldfield et al. 2003a; Figure 3.1). Strong evidence for the
importance of deforestation during the period of Roman occupation also comes
from many studies in France (e.g. Noel et al. 2001; Cyprien et al. 2004).
In some other parts of Europe, the evidence points to earlier and somewhat
more progressive conversion of forest to less productive ecosystems as a result
of human activities. In parts of Denmark, for example, there are indications of
irreversible deforestation from ca. 500 bc onwards (Bradshaw et al. 2005a).
Odgaard and Rasmussen (2000) reinforce this view by statistical comparisons
between the mosaic of land-cover types documented in 1800 and those inferred
from successive pollen records spanning the period 4500 bc to ad 1800 at 20 sites
(Figure 3.2). In-depth, multi-disciplinary studies of ecological and cultural history
at the regional scale are relatively rare, but one such is that of Berglund (1991) in
the Ystad region of southern Sweden (Figure 3.3). As in the Danish study, he
records the progressive deforestation of the landscape during prehistory. Inter-
mediate between the studies showing progressive deforestation without significant
recovery, and those marked by recurrent re-afforestation, are sites such as Lough
Neagh in Northern Ireland where pulses of forest clearance, marked by peaks in
weeds and bracken, are superimposed on evidence for a progressive increase in
grassland (O’Sullivan et al. 1973).
Heathlands are distinctive habitats often of high conservation value in northern
and western Europe. Understanding their origins and history is germane to any
future management designed to preserve the special habitats and high biodiversity
that they contain (Walker et al. 2003). They have often been seen as, in part at least,
the result of forest clearance combined with subsequent soil degradation and/or
sustained management practices favoring the persistence of ericaceous shrubs and
acidophilous herbs. Fyfe et al. (2003) interpret their pollen records from Exmoor
in south-west England as indicating the expansion of heathland from Neolithic
times onwards, rather as did Godwin in his early study of the Breckland heaths of
East Anglia (Godwin 1944), although they regard the use of fire as important for
the maintenance of heathland. Savukynien et al. (2003) present evidence from
Lithuania that points to the development of heathland from 1200 years BP
onwards, as well as its maintenance largely through burning until recent times
when its extent has been reduced. Following the earlier work of Kaland (1986),
Prosch-Danielson and Simonsen (2000) show that the expansion of coastal heath-
land in south-west Norway took place from 4000 to 200 bc, but was mostly com-
pleted by the end of the Bronze Age. They suggest that the expansion can best be
explained as a result of the interaction between land-use history, topography, and
edaphic conditions, within a climatic regime that favored heathland development.
9781405159050_4_003.qxd 6/3/08 3:53 PM Page 60