
Environmental Encyclopedia 3
Hydroponics
macro- and micro- (trace) nutrients needed by the plants
are supplied in the water.
Hydroponic methods have been used for more than
2,000 years, dating back to the Hanging Gardens of Babylon.
More recently, it has been used by plant physiologists to
discover which nutrients are essential for plant growth. Un-
like soil, where
nutrient
levels are unknown and variable,
precise amounts and kinds of minerals can be added to
deionized water, and removed individually, to find out their
role in plant growth and development. During World War
II hydroponics was used to grow vegetable crops by U.S.
troops stationed on some Pacific islands.
Today, hydroponics is becoming a more popular alter-
native to conventional agriculture in locations with low or
inaccessible sources of water or where land available for
farming is scarce. For example, islands and
desert
areas like
the American Southwest and the Middle East are prime
regions for hydroponics. Plants are typically grown in green-
houses to prevent water loss. Even in temperate areas where
fresh water is readily available, hydroponics can be used to
grow crops in greenhouses during the winter months.
Two methods are traditionally used in hydroponics.
The original technique is the water method, where plants are
supported from a wire mesh or similar framework so that the
roots hang into troughs which receive continuous supplies of
nutrients. A recent modification is a nutrient-film technique
(NFT), also called the nutrient-flow method, where the
trough is lined with plastic. Water flows continuously over
the roots, decreasing the stagnant boundary layer surrounding
each root, and thus enhances nutrient uptake. This provides
a versatile, lightweight, and inexpensive system. In the second
method, plants are supported in a growing medium such as
sterile sand, gravel, crushed volcanic rock, vermiculite, perlite,
sawdust, peatmoss, or rice hulls. The nutrient solution is sup-
plied from overhead or underneath holding tanks either con-
tinuously or semi-continuously using a drip method. The nu-
trient solution is usually not reused.
On some Caribbean Islands like St. Croix, hydropon-
ics is being used in conjunction with intensive fish farms
(e.g., tilapia) which use recirculated water (a practice is more
recently known as aquaponics). This is a “win-win” situation
because the nitrogenous wastes, which are toxic to the fish,
are passed through large greenhouses with hydroponically-
grown plants like lettuce. The plants remove the nutrients
and the water is returned to the fish tanks. There is a sensitive
balance between stocking density of fish and lettuce produc-
tion. Too high a ratio of lettuce plants to fish results in
lower lettuce production due to nutrient limitation. Too low
a ratio also results in low vegetable production, but this time
as a result of the buildup of toxic
chemicals
. The optimum
yield came from a ratio of 1.9 lettuce plants to 1 fish. One
pound (0.45 kg) of feed per day was appropriate to feed 33
742
lb (15 kg) of tilapia fingerlings, which sustained 189 lettuce
plants and produced nearly 3,300 heads of lettuce annually.
When integrated systems (fish-hydroponic recirculating
units) are compared to separate production systems, the
results clearly favor the former. The combined costs and
chemical requirements of the separate production systems
was nearly two to three times greater than that of the recircu-
lating system to produce the same amount of lettuce and
fish. However, there are some drawbacks that must be con-
sidered—disease outbreaks in plants and/or fish; the need to
critically maintain proper nutrient (especially trace element),
plant, and fish levels; uncertainties in fish and market prices;
and the need for highly-skilled labor. The integrated method
can be adapted to grow other types of vegetables like straw-
berries, ornamental plants like roses, and other types of
animals such as shellfish. Some teachers have even incorpo-
rated this technique into their classrooms to illustrate ecolog-
ical as well as botanical and culture principles.
Some proponents of hydroponic gardening make fairly
optimistic claims and state that a sophisticated unit is no
more expensive than an equivalent parcel of farmed land.
They also argue that hydroponic units (commonly called
“hydroponicums") require less attention than terrestrial agri-
culture. Some examples of different types of “successful”
hydroponicums are: a person in the desert area of southern
California has used the NFT system for over 18 years and
grows his plants void of substate in water contained in open
cement troughs that cover 3 acres (7.5 ha); a hydroponicum
in Orlando, Florida, utilizes the Japanese system of planting
seedlings on styrofoam boards that float on the surface of a
nutrient bath which is constantly aerated; an outfit in
Queens, New York, uses the Israeli Ein-Gedi system which
allows plant roots to hang free inside a tube which is sprayed
regularly with a nutrient solution, yielding 150,000 lbs
(68,000 kg) of tomatoes, 100,000 lb (45,500 kg) of cucum-
bers, and one million heads of lettuce per acre (0.4 ha) each
year; and finally, a farmer in Blooming
Prairie
, Minnesota,
uses the NFT system in a greenhouse to grow Bibb and
leafy lettuce year-round so he can sell his produce to area
hospitals, some supermarkets, and a few produce warehouses.
Most people involved in hydroponics agree that the
main disadvantage is the high cost for labor, lighting, water,
and energy. Root fungal infections can also be easily spread.
Advantages include the ability to grow crops in
arid
regions
or where land is at a premium; more controlled conditions,
such as the ability to grow plants indoors, and thus minimize
pests and weeds; greater planting densities; and constant
supply of nutrients. Hydroponic gardening is becoming more
popular for home gardeners. It may also be a viable option
to growing crops in some developing countries. Overall, the
future looks bright for hydroponics.
[John Korstad]