of 1910–18, depictions of mannequins and threatening shadows in modern city squares.
Unlike most of his contemporaries, who were moving toward abstraction, de Chirico
continued to use figurative elements, combining them in striking ways which drew
attention to the mystery of being. His interest in heightened perceptions and a reality
which lies beyond physical objects made him a crucial model for the surrealists.
Critical and commercial consensus is that de Chirico then suffered a very long period
of decline, when he repeated, plagiarized and even faked his own works. At the same
time he took legal action against art museums which owned earlier versions of his work,
claiming that these apparently genuine examples were forgeries. In his ‘Baroque’ style,
which lasted from the 1930s into the 1960s, there is much evidence of the brushstroke,
tacky mockheroic references to mythology, and extensive white highlighting, giving an
overall feeling of kitsch. Nevertheless, his works from the Fascist period and later
inspired the transavantgarde, who saw his rather idealized realism as a bridge between
traditional and contemporary art. His all-over style, with attention to the spaces as well as
objects, his simple modelling and his use of black outlines reappear in their work.
In the 1960s and 1970s de Chirico returned to the smoother brushwork and bizarre
juxtaposition of elements of his metaphysical style. The Return of Ulysses (1968), for
example, shows an effete hero paddling a small dinghy across his living room floor.
De Chirico’s most timeless feature is irony, amply manifested, for example, in his
1950 advertisement for the Fiat 1400, which displays the car in classical grandeur with a
young god leading a prancing Pegasus. The god is gesturing towards the Fiat as if
pointing out its virtues to his steed, perhaps even suggesting that the automobile will
eventually supplant him. More generally in de Chirico’s work, there is an implied irony
in the perspective used to construct pictorial space, which is intentionally ‘not quite
right’. De Chirico anticipates that, to an eye attuned to Renaissance art, such proportions
will cause unease and discomfort.
De Chirico’s eclecticism and his taste for pastiche and the recycling of styles put him
completely at odds with the modernist notion of the avantgarde in vogue at mid-century,
but it was precisely these elements that made him the outstanding precursor of
postmodernity.
Further reading
Calvesi, M. and Ursino, M. (1996) De Chirico: The New Metaphysics, trans. M.Eaton and F.Lutz,
Rome: Edizioni De Luca/Craftsman House (concentrates on the later work from the 1960s and
1970s, with colour illustrations).
Far, I. (1968) De Chirico, trans. J.Bernstein, New York: H.N.Abrams (substantial illustrations but
basic and uncritical text, by the artist’s wife).
Lista, G. (1991) De Chirico, trans. E.Crockett, Paris: Kazan (small format; deals intelligently with
philosophical underpinnings of works; illustrated).
MAX STAPLES
Encyclopedia of contemporary italian culture 226