
to the case when the consumer buys b
1
units of G1 and b
2
units of G2. Both of these combina-
tions yield the same level of satisfaction and the consumer is indifferent to choosing between
them. In symbols we have
U(a
1
, a
2
) = 20 and U(b
1
, b
2
) = 20
Points C and D lie on indifference curves that are further away from the origin. The combina-
tions of goods that these points represent yield higher levels of utility and so are ranked above
those of A and B.
Indifference curves are usually downward-sloping. If fewer purchases are made of G1 then
the consumer has to compensate for this by buying more of type G2 to maintain the same level
of satisfaction. Note also from Figure 5.4 that the slope of an indifference curve varies along its
length, taking large negative values close to the vertical axis and becoming almost zero as the
curve approaches the horizontal axis. Again this is to be expected for any function that obeys
the law of diminishing marginal utility. A consumer who currently owns a large number of
items of G2 and relatively few of G1 is likely to value G1 more highly. Consequently, he or she
might be satisfied in sacrificing a large number of items of G2 to gain just one or two extra
items of G1. In this region the marginal utility of x
1
is much greater than that of x
2
, which
accounts for the steepness of the curve close to the vertical axis. Similarly, as the curve
approaches the horizontal axis, the situation is reversed and the curve flattens off. We quantify
this exchange of goods by introducing the marginal rate of commodity substitution, MRCS.
This is defined to be the increase in x
2
necessary to maintain a constant value of utility when x
1
decreases by 1 unit. This is illustrated in Figure 5.5.
Starting at point E, we move 1 unit to the left. The value of MRCS is then the vertical dis-
tance that we need to travel if we are to remain on the indifference curve passing through E.
Now this sort of ‘1 unit change’ definition is precisely the approach that we took in Section 4.3
when discussing marginal functions. In that section we actually defined the marginal function
to be the derived function and we showed that the ‘1 unit change’ definition gave a good
approximation to it. If we do the same here then we can define
MRCS =−
dx
2
dx
1
5.2 • Partial elasticity and marginal functions
363
Figure 5.5
MFE_C05b.qxd 16/12/2005 10:40 Page 363