
14.5 Carbon–Carbon Bond Formation: Friedel–Crafts Alkylation 639
Summary
Benzene fails to react with most HX reagents under conditions that easily result
in addition to alkenes and dienes. The X
2
reagents, such as bromine and chlo-
rine, are similarly unreactive. Benzene lies in too deep a well, and it is protected
by activation energy barriers that are too high for these reactions to occur.
Sulfonation, nitration, chlorination, and bromination all serve to underscore
the general principles of electrophilic aromatic substitution. In each reaction, an
electrophile powerful enough to react with the weakly nucleophilic benzene ring
must be generated. The aromatic ring and the powerful electrophile together
will have a high enough energy that the reaction can proceed over the energy
barrier.The addition reaction first generates a resonance-stabilized (but not aro-
matic) cyclohexadienyl cation that can be deprotonated to regenerate an aromatic
system. The general mechanism is shown again in Figure 14.33.
+
H
E
BH
E
+
–
B
..
E
+
FIGURE 14.33 Once again, here is
the general mechanism for aromatic
substitution, where E
D
,
SO
2
OH,
NO
2
,
Cl, or
Br.
14.5 Carbon–Carbon Bond Formation:
Friedel–Crafts Alkylation
We are now able to make a few substituted aromatic compounds, and this capability
will shortly prove quite useful. However, much of the interest in synthetic chemistry
involves the construction of carbon–carbon bonds. We have made no progress at all
in finding ways to make bonds from benzene to carbon. Here and in the next section
we do just that by making use of another electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction
quite closely related to the bromination and chlorination reactions we have just seen.
The Friedel–Crafts alkylation reaction is an electrophilic aromatic substitution that
attaches an alkyl group to the aromatic ring.It is named for Charles Friedel (1832–1899)
and James M. Crafts (1839–1917), who discovered it by accident when they tried to
synthesize pentyl chloride from pentyl iodide through reaction with aluminum chlo-
ride in an aromatic solvent. Instead of the hoped-for chloride, substituted aromatic
hydrocarbons appeared. The Friedel–Crafts reaction is closely related to bromination
and chlorination of benzene. If we treat benzene with isopropyl bromide in the hope
that a nucleophilic attack of benzene on isopropyl bromide will produce isopropylben-
zene (cumene), we are sure to be disappointed (Fig. 14.34). Benzene is by no means a
strong nucleophile and isopropyl bromide can scarcely be described as a powerful elec-
trophile.The proposed reaction is utterly hopeless, and fails to give product.
Br No reaction
FIGURE 14.34 Benzene fails to react
with isopropyl bromide.
So why even bring the subject up? Notice that this process does look a bit like
another reaction that fails to give product—the attempt to form chlorobenzene or
bromobenzene from chlorine or bromine and benzene. Those halogenations are
transformed into a success by the addition of a catalyst, either FeCl
3
or FeBr
3
, which
converts the halogen, a weak electrophile, into a much stronger Lewis acid