
666 CHAPTER 14 Substitution Reactions of Aromatic Compounds
Summary
A group (G) on the benzene ring determines the position of the next electrophilic
aromatic substitution reaction. Generally, groups that direct ortho/para also
increase the rate of substitution. In such cases, the ring is said to be activated.
If substitution is in the ortho or para position (but not the meta position), G
provides additional stabilization to the cyclohexadienyl cation intermediate, and
thus increases the rate. Meta-directing groups make the best of an energetically
bad set of choices. Meta substitution is slow and wins by default—it is the least-
bad alternative for some substituents. In this case the ring is said to be deactivated
with respect to electrophilic aromatic substitution.
+
These σ bonds are
strongly polarized
so as to make
introduction of a
positive charge into
the ring difficult
N(CH
3
)
3
H
E
(CH
3
)
3
N
++
O
2
N
δ
–
δ
+
δ
–
δ
+
+
NO
2
H
E
E
+
E
+
Shows a dipole in the
direction indicated by
the
δ
+
and δ
–
FIGURE 14.79 In the
trimethylanilinium ion and
nitrobenzene, the σ bond from the
ring to the substituent is polarized
by the electron-withdrawing group.
Further substitution is difficult.
These subsituents will reduce the electron density in the ring, making the aro-
matic compound a weaker nucleophile, and thus a less active participant in any
reaction with an electrophilic reagent. More important is the destabilizing effect
of electron withdrawal on the charged intermediate and the partially charged tran-
sition state leading to the intermediate. So, it is no surprise to find that both
trimethylanilinium ion and nitrobenzene are very slow to react in electrophilic aro-
matic substitution. Similar rate-retarding effects might be expected to operate
whenever an atom more electronegative than carbon is attached to the ring.
If that is the case, what is one to make of the rate
accelerating effect of the methoxy group? Anisole reacts
much faster than benzene, and yet the methoxy group
is certainly withdrawing electrons from the ring
through induction.The dipole in the carbon–oxygen
σ bond surely points toward the electronegative
oxygen atom (Fig. 14.80).
The answer to this conundrum is simply that the
resonance effect must substantially outweigh the
inductive effect.The fourth resonance form in Figure
14.66 helps more in energy terms than the inductive
withdrawal of σ electrons by methoxy hurts.
E
+
This σ bond is also strongly
polarized so as to make
introduction of a positive
charge into the ring difficult;
yet, the reactions of anisole
are very fast
CH
3
O
E
H
+
CH
3
O
δ
–
δ
+
FIGURE 14.80 The carbon–oxygen bond in anisole is also electron-
withdrawing, yet substitution is directed ortho/para and the reactions
are fast.The resonance effect outweighs this inductive effect.
14.10 Inductive Effects in Aromatic Substitution
So far, we have mainly considered the way in which the group attached to a ben-
zene ring can affect further reaction through either resonance stabilization or elec-
trostatic destabilization of the intermediate cyclohexadienyl cation. We should also
consider the inductive effects of groups,which act by withdrawing or donating elec-
trons through the σ bonds. For example, both the trimethylammonium group and
the nitro group are strongly electron-withdrawing by induction (Fig. 14.79).