
PROBLEM 15.1 How would a separation of enantiomers be possible? Are not all
physical properties (except, of course, for the direction of rotation of the plane of
plane-polarized light) identical for enantiomers? Can you guess the principle on
which the chromatographic separation of enantiomers must rest? Hint: What is
true for enantiomers is not necessarily true for diastereomers (p. 169).
696 CHAPTER 15 Analytical Chemistry: Spectroscopy
Even given a successful separation of a reaction mixture, the chemist is now faced
with the daunting task of working out the structures of the various components. Just
how do we find out what’s in that bottle? In the old days, structure determination was
a respected profession,and many careers were built through the chemical determination
of complex molecular structures. Diagnostic reactions were run, and the presence or
absence of functional groups inferred from the results. Gradually,the results from many
chemical experiments allowed the formulation of a reasonable structural hypothesis
that could be tested through further chemical reactions. The intellectual complexity
of such work was substantial,and the experimental skill required was prodigious.These
days, the correlation of the results of chemical reactions with chemical structure has
been largely replaced with the spectroscopic identification of compounds, and every
chemist is an analytical chemist.The profession of analytical chemist has by no means
disappeared,but rather has expanded to include us all. Ultraviolet/visible (UV/vis) spec-
troscopy (p. 525) was the earliest form of spectroscopy to gain widespread use. It was
followed by mass spectrometry (MS), which is capable of determining molecular
weights, and infrared (IR) spectroscopy, in which the vibrations of atoms in bonds are
detected. At the end of the 1950s, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
appeared,
2
and the real revolution in the determination of the structures of organic
molecules began. In this chapter, we will briefly discuss chromatography, MS, and IR
spectroscopy, and then proceed to a more detailed investigation of NMR spectroscopy.
2
Professor Martin Saunders (b. 1931) told MJ of the arrival of the long and eagerly awaited first NMR spec-
trometer at Yale in the late 1950s. The magnet arrived in a plywood carton labeled in bold letters, “2.5 tons.”
Unfortunately, the workman who was to bring the machine into the laboratory didn’t believe that such a heavy
object could be in such a flimsy box and attempted to use his forklift, rated at 1 ton, to bring it in. The fork-
lift did its best and labored mightily to lift the object into the air. It succeeded at this task, but then, appar-
ently exhausted, gave out and dropped the magnet to the stone floor, where it burst its packing and lay blocking
the entrance.The workman then attached a chain to the magnet and dragged it about 30 feet across the cob-
blestones to the side. Naturally Professor Saunders, whose professional fate depended to a fair extent on the
performance of this instrument, was less than happy about this state of affairs. However, the story has a happy
ending. The machine functioned brilliantly after minor repairs, and Professor Saunders has had a long and
outstanding career at Yale. He claims that he advocated to Varian Associates, the manufacturer of the instru-
ment, that they add a 5-foot drop to a cobblestone floor to the manufacturing process for their magnets, in
order to bring all their magnets up to the standard of this one.Perhaps understandably, they ignored his advice.
ESSENTIAL SKILLS AND DETAILS
1. “All” there is to understanding nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is to know how the
chemical shift (δ) arises, how coupling between atoms works, and how intensities of
signals are compared.That’s only three things, but each requires a lot of experience
before using it becomes second nature. Understanding the chemical shift δ requires
no more than realizing that “different” hydrogens will resonate at different frequencies.
That’s not a difficult concept, but understanding what makes two hydrogens “different”
is less simple! The coupling between atoms means that hydrogens on adjacent carbons
“talk”to each other. The state of one influences the properties of the other.There is a
simple method for translating the electron–nuclear “talk” but, again, it requires an