
Chapter 85 NECK TRAUMA 595
15. Which diagnostic studies are important in suspected laryngeal injuries?
n
Soft-tissue cervical radiographs may show a fractured larynx, subcutaneous air, or
prevertebral air.
n
CT accurately identifies the location and extent of laryngeal fractures. CT should be done
when the diagnosis of a laryngeal fracture is still suspected despite a negative examination
of the endolarynx or when flexible laryngoscopy cannot be done (e.g., intubated patient).
n
Flexible laryngoscopy provides valuable information regarding the integrity of the
cartilaginous framework and the function of the vocal cords.
16. Are diagnostic studies necessary in suspected esophageal injuries?
Yes. Soft-tissue cervical radiographs may show subcutaneous emphysema or an increased
prevertebral shadow. Chest radiograph findings include pleural effusion, pneumothorax,
mediastinal air, and mediastinal widening. Esophageal contrast studies should be done initially
with radiopaque contrast medium (Gastrografin); if negative, studies should be repeated with
barium to increase diagnostic yield. Radiographic imaging is difficult because of the high
false-negative rate. Esophagography has a 30% to 50% false-negative rate and should be
followed by esophagoscopy in patients with suspected esophageal injury. Rigid endoscopy is
more sensitive than flexible endoscopy. No one study can exclude esophageal perforation; a
combination of physical signs, plain and contrast radiographs, and esophagoscopy should be
used to make the diagnosis. Isolated esophageal injuries after blunt injury are extremely rare.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Biffl WL, Moore EE: Identifying the asymptomatic patient with blunt carotid arterial injury. J Trauma
47:1163–1164, 1999.
2. Demetriades D, Theodorou D, Cornwell E, et al: Evaluation of penetrating injuries of the neck: prospective
study of 223 patients. World J Surg 21:47–48, 1997.
3. Deshaies EM, Nair AK, Boulos AS, et al: Blunt traumatic injuries to the carotid and vertebral arteries of the
neck and skull base. Contemp Neurosurg 30:1–6;2008.
4. Eastman AL, Chason DP, Perez CL, et al: Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt
cervical vascular injury: is it ready for prime time? J Trauma 60:925–9, 2006.
5. Fry WR, Dort JA, Smith RS, et al: Duplex scanning replaces arteriography and operative exploration in the
diagnosis of potential cervical vascular injury. Am J Surg 168:693–695, 1994.
6. Knaut AL, Kendall JL: Penetrating neck trauma. In Wolfson AB, Hendey GW, Hendry PL, et al, editors: Clinical
practice of emergency medicine, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2005, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, pp 956–962.
7. LeBlang SD, Nunez DB: Noninvasive imaging of cervical vascular injuries. Am J Roentgenol 175:1269–1278, 2002.
8. Múnera F, Cohn S, Rivas LA: Penetrating Injuries of the neck: use of helical computed tomographic
angiography. J Trauma 58:413–418, 2005.
9. Múnera F, Soto JA, Palacio D, et al: Diagnosis of arterial injuries caused by penetrating trauma to the neck:
comparison of helical CT angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 216:356–362, 2000.
10. Schaider JJ, Bailitz J: Neck trauma: don’t put your neck on the line. Emerg Med Pract 5:1–23, 2003.
11. Tishman SA, Bokhari F, Collier B, et al: Clinical practice guideline: penetrating zone II neck trauma. J Trauma
64:1392–1405; 2008.
12. Weitzel N, Kendall JL, Pons P: Blind nasotracheal intubation for patients with penetrating neck trauma. J Trauma
56.1097–1101, 2004.