
subsequent prograde reactions will liberate more
water from them, facilitating additional corrosion of
remaining soluble grains and bodily rotation of inert
flakes. This metamorphic differentiation can thus con-
tinue during prograde metamorphism.
In a classic study of slates in the Delaware Water
Gap area of New Jersey and Pennsylvania, Maxwell
(1962) envisaged that, prior to consolidation, a thick
sequence of muds, silts, and sands was dewatered as
it was subjected to tectonic forces, bodily rotating
phyllosilicate flakes into a preferred planar orientation
parallel to the plane of flattening and to axial planes of
folded beds. Grains of sand were entrained into the
expelled water that migrated along incipient cleavage
surfaces, forming cleavage-parallel sheets of sandstone
that penetrate into the slate from adjacent sandy beds.
Subsequent workers on these and other slates around
the world have concluded that mechanical rotation of
detrital grains can occur in the early stages of cleavage
development but that pressure solution and mimetic
recrystallization are dominant processes during later
progressive metamorphism.
After one and a half centuries, controversy continues
as to the amount of volume lost during evolution of slaty
cleavage and foliation in tectonites in general. Estim-
ates range upwards to 60% of the protolith volume,
as Sorby (1853) first claimed. Estimates are based on,
for example, a comparison between the amount of per-
ceived flattening perpendicular to the foliation and the
extension parallel to it. Debate persists regarding how
much of the lost volume was fluids, principally water,
and how much was nonvolatile components, and the
degree to which the rock system remain closed, except
for the expelled water, and on what scale—domainal or
outcrop or larger. Local overgrowths in strain shadows
indicate grain-scale precipitation of transferred solute.
On the other hand, low-grade metasedimentary terranes
are characterized by widespread veins of predomin-
antly quartz that probably represent the sinks for the
substantial silica dissolved during foliation evolution,
as well as dehydration mineral reactions. Many geo-
chemical studies (see references in Vernon, 1998) have
attempted to cast light on the degree to which meta-
morphosing systems are closed by comparing ratios
of mobile to immobile elements, such as Al, Ti, and
Zr (Section 16.8.4). However, this approach suffers
from the apparent absence of truly immobile elements.
Rather than making complementary studies, geochemists
and structural petrologists have tended to work on dif-
ferent terranes. An exception is the work of Erslev (1998),
who concluded that nonvolatile losses in three of four
North American Paleozoic slate terranes are minimal.
Differentiated Compositional Layering. Layers of con-
trasting composition are evident at a range of scales in
metamorphic rocks of a wide range of grade.
Large-scale layers in recognizable, generally low-
grade metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks are
commonly relict depositional beds and flows, especially
where there are contrasts in composition and thickness
in a sequence. Smaller scale compositional layers, on
the order of centimeters, can be more difficult to inter-
pret accurately. Bedding features, such as graded grain
size and cross-bedding, can be helpful, but other
purely metamorphic fabrics can locally resemble these
features, which are usually evident only in weakly
metamorphosed, low-grade rocks. Even if it can be
unequivocally demonstrated that a rock protolith was
sedimentary, there is no assurance that the layering is
relict bedding because other origins are possible. For
example, some layers and especially lenses of very small
aspect ratio (thickness divided by length) result from
transposition processes (Figures 14.19 and 17.33).
Other layers originate in other ways, as the following
paragraphs suggest.
Differentiated layering is a product of organization
or reorganization of matter during metamorphism of
a protolith lacking such layering (Williams, 1990). Its
true origin can be verified where the layering over-
prints an earlier foliation, which might or might not
be a relict bedding in the protolith, or where it can be
seen to have evolved from essentially isotropic rock by
metamorphic processes (e.g. Figure 14.17). As in the
growth of large porphyroblasts during metamorphism
(e.g. soccer-ball-size garnet, Figure 14.8), segregation
of chemical elements by diffusive transport is likely to
be involved, except creating a planar fabric element
rather than a subspherical one.
This layer-generating metamorphic differentiation
raises several questions. Can the coarser-grained and
thicker compositional layering typifying gneisses (see,
for example, Figure 19.24a) somehow evolve by further
progressive metamorphism of the differentiated P- and
Q-domain layering in finer grained tectonites described
above? How does compositional layering develop in
orthogneisses derived from isotropic magmatic pro-
toliths? How much compositional layering in high-
grade migmatitic gneisses (Figures 15.12–15.14) is of
anatectic origin? Field observations and experimental
data on phase equilibria indicate that at least some
migmatites are a product of partial melting and that
concurrent deformation can play a significant role
in segregating the partial melt from the crystalline
residue and concentrating it into planar domains
(Section 11.6.4 and, for example, Brown and Rushmer,
1997). But other examples of migmatization might be
formed by a strictly subsolidus process and, if so, how
does the differentiation into contrasting leucosome
and melanosome take place (Figure 15.15)? These
and other questions that could be posed highlight the
dilemma of how segregation occurs to create the com-
positional layering in gneisses.
560 Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology