
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO
MHDQ256-Ch13 MHDQ256-Smith-v1.cls December 31, 2010 16:55
LT (Late Transcendental)
CONFIRMING PAGES
13-87 SECTION 13.8
..
Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multipliers 895
28. f (x, y) = 4xy subject to 4x
2
+ y
2
≤ 8
29. f (x, y) = 3 − x + xy − 2y inside and on the triangle with
vertices (1, 0), (5, 0) and (1, 4)
30. f (x, y) = xy
2
subject to x
2
+ y
2
≤ 3(x, y ≥ 0)
31. f (x, y, z) = x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
subject to x
4
+ y
4
+ z
4
≤ 1
32. f (x, y, z) = x
2
y
2
+ z
2
subject to x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
≤ 1
............................................................
33. Rework example 8.2 with extra fuel, so that u
2
t = 11,000.
34. In exercise 33, compute λ. Comparing solutions to example
8.2 and exercise 33, compute the change in z divided by the
change in u
2
t.
35. Solve example 8.2 by substituting t = 10,000/u
2
into the
height equation. Be sure to show that your solution represents
a maximum height.
36. In example 8.2, the general constraint is u
2
t = k and the re-
sulting maximum height is h(k). Use the technique of exercise
35 and the results of example 8.2 to show that λ = h
(k).
37. Suppose that the business in example 8.4 has profit func-
tion P(x, y, z) = 3x + 6y + 6z and manufacturing constraint
2x
2
+ y
2
+ 4z
2
≤ 8800. Maximize the profits.
38. Suppose that the business in example 8.4 has profit func-
tion P(x, y, z) = 3xz + 6y and manufacturing constraint
x
2
+ 2y
2
+ z
2
≤ 6. Maximize the profits.
39. In exercise 37, show that theLagrange multiplier givesthe rate
of change of the profit relative to a change in the production
constraint.
40. Use the value of λ (do not solve any equations) to determine
the amount of profit if the constraint in exercise 38 is changed
to x
2
+ 2y
2
+ z
2
≤ 7.
41. Minimize 2x +2y subject to the constraint xy = c for some
constant c > 0 and conclude that for a givenarea, the rectangle
with smallest perimeter is the square.
42. As in exercise 41, find the rectangular box of a given volume
that has the minimum surface area.
43. Maximize y − x subject to the constraint x
2
+ y
2
= 1.
44. Maximize e
x+y
subject to the constraint x
2
+ y
2
= 2.
45. Consider the problem of finding extreme values of xy
2
subject
to x + y = 0. Show that the Lagrange multiplier method iden-
tifies (0, 0) as a critical point. Show that this point is neither a
local minimum nor a local maximum.
46. Make the substitution y =−x in the function f (x, y) = xy
2
.
Show that x = 0 is a critical point and determine what type
point is at x = 0. Explain why the Lagrange multiplier method
fails in exercise 45.
............................................................
Exercises 47–50 involve optimization with two constraints.
47. Minimize f (x, y, z) = x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
,subject to theconstraints
x + 2y + 3z = 6 and y + z = 0.
48. Interpret the function f (x, y, z) of exercise 47 in terms of the
distance from a point (x, y, z) to the origin. Sketch the two
planes given in exercise 47. Interpretexercise 47 as finding the
closest point on a line to the origin.
49. Maximize f (x, y, z) = xyz, subject to the constraints
x + y + z = 4 and x + y − z = 0.
50. Maximize f (x, y, z) = 3x + y + 2z, subject tothe constraints
y
2
+ z
2
= 1 and x + y − z = 1.
............................................................
51. Find the points on the intersection of x
2
+ y
2
= 1 and
x
2
+ z
2
= 1 that are (a) closest to and (b) farthest from the
origin.
52. Find the pointonthe intersection of x + 2y + z = 2and y = x
that is closest to the origin.
53. Use Lagrange multipliers to explore the problem of finding
the closest point on y = x
n
to the point (0, 1), for some pos-
itive integer n. Show that (0, 0) is always a solution to the
Lagrange multiplier equation. Show that (0, 0) is the location
of a local maximumfor n = 2, but a localminimum for n > 2.
As n →∞, show that the difference between the absolute
minimum and the local minimum at (0, 0) goes to 0.
54. Repeat example 8.4 with constraints x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0 and z ≥ 0.
Note that you can find the maximum on the boundary x = 0
by maximizing 8y + 6z subject to 4y
2
+ 2z
2
≤ 800.
55. Estimate the closest point on the paraboloid z = x
2
+ y
2
to
the point (1, 0, 0).
56. Estimatetheclosestpointonthehyperboloid x
2
+ y
2
− z
2
= 1
to the point (0, 2, 0).
APPLICATIONS
57. In the picture, a sailboat is sailing into a crosswind. The wind
is blowing out of the north; the sail is at an angle α to the east
of due north and at an angle β north of the hull of the boat.
The hull, in turn, is at an angle θ to the north of due east. Ex-
plain why α + β + θ =
π
2
. If the wind is blowing with speed
w, then the northward component of the wind’s force on the
boat is given by w sinα sin β sinθ . If this component is posi-
tive, the boat can travel “against the wind.” Taking w = 1 for
convenience, maximize sinα sinβ sin θ subject to the con-
straint α +β +θ =
π
2
.
u
b
a
58. Suppose a music company sells two types of speakers. The
profit for selling x speakers of style A and y speakers of styleB
is modeled by f (x, y) = x
3
+ y
3
− 5xy. The company can’t
manufacture more than k speakers total in a given month