(c) Find a number such that
then
71. Solve the inequality .
72. A prime number is a positive integer that has no factors
other than 1 and itself. The first few primes are , , , , ,
, , . . . . We denote by the number of primes that are
less than or equal to . For instance, because there
are six primes smaller than 15.
(a) Calculate the numbers and .
[Hint: To find , first compile a list of the primes up
to 100 using the sieve of Eratosthenes: Write the numbers
from 2 to 100 and cross out all multiples of 2. Then cross
out all multiples of 3. The next remaining number is 5, so
cross out all remaining multiples of it, and so on.]
(b) By inspecting tables of prime numbers and tables of loga-
rithms, the great mathematician K. F. Gauss made the
guess in 1792 (when he was 15) that the number of
primes up to is approximately when is large.
More precisely, he conjectured that
This was finally proved, a hundred years later, by Jacques
Hadamard and Charles de la Vallée Poussin and is called
the Prime Number Theorem. Provide evidence for the
truth of this theorem by computing the ratio of to
for , , , , , and . Use the
following data: , ,
, , .
(c) Use the Prime Number Theorem to estimate the number
of primes up to a billion.
(
!10
7
" ! 664,579
(
!10
6
" ! 78,498
(
!10
5
" ! 9592
(
!10
4
" ! 1229
(
!1000" ! 168
10
7
10
6
10
5
10
4
1000n ! 100n#ln n
(
!n"
lim
n l !
(
!n"
n#ln n
! 1
nn#ln nn
(
!100"
(
!100"
(
!25"
(
!15" ! 6n
(
!n"1713
117532
ln!x
2
' 2x ' 2" & 0
ln x
x
0.1
-
0.1x " Nif
N
;
64. For the period from 1980 to 2000, the percentage of house-
holds in the United States with at least one VCR has been
modeled by the function
where the time is measured in years since midyear 1980, so
. Use a graph to estimate the time at which the
number of VCRs was increasing most rapidly. Then use
derivatives to give a more accurate estimate.
65. (a) Show that the function is an
odd function.
(b) Find the inverse function of .
66. Find an equation of the tangent to the curve that is
perpendicular to the line .
67. Show that the equation has no solution. What can
you say about the function ?
68. Any function of the form , where ,
can be analyzed as a power of by writing so
that . Using this device, calculate each limit.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
69. Let . Prove, using Definitions 4.4.6 and 4.4.7, that
(a) (b)
;
70. (a) Compare the rates of growth of and
by graphing both and in several viewing
rectangles. When does the graph of finally surpass the
graph of ?
(b) Graph the function in a viewing rect-
angle that displays the behavior of the function as .x l !
h!x" ! !ln x"#x
0.1
t
f
tft!x" ! ln x
f !x" ! x
0.1
lim
x
l
!
a
x
! !lim
x
l
'!
a
x
! 0
a " 1
lim
x
l
!
!ln 2x"
'ln x
lim
x
l
0
$
x
1#x
lim
x
l
0
$
x
'ln x
lim
x
l
!
x
ln x
f !x" ! e
h!x" ln t!x"
t!x" ! e
ln t!x"
e
t!x" " 0f !x" ! $ t!x"%
h!x"
f !x" ! x
1#ln x
x
1# ln x
! 2
2x ' y ! 8
y ! e
'x
f
f !x" ! ln
(
x $
s
x
2
$ 1
)
0 & t & 20
t
V!t" !
85
1 $ 53e
'0.5t
SECTION 7.4 DERIVATIVES OF LOGARITHMIC FUNCTIONS
|| ||
411
DER IVATIV ES O F LO GARI THM I C FU NCT I ONS
In this section we find the derivatives of the logarithmic functions and the expo-
nential functions . We start with the natural logarithmic function . We know
that it is differentiable because it is the inverse of the differentiable function .
PROOF Let . Then
e
y
! x
y ! ln x
d
dx
!ln x" !
1
x
1
y ! e
x
y ! ln xy ! a
x
y ! log
a
x
7.4