486
sculpture has often been compared to
Giacometti’s. Like him, she was able to recon-
sider her approach to sculpture during the
war. She was aware of his work and, like him,
she had undergone the influence of prewar
Surrealist discourse. In her Mante religieuse of
1946, the hybrid woman/insect figure, com-
parable to Giacometti’s Femme égorgée, em-
bodies an existential nightmare evoking the
thirst for destruction which the war years had
witnessed.
During this period, Picasso’s innovative pre-
war sculpture found a public for the first time,
not least thanks to Brassai’s book of photo-
graphs, Les Sculptures de Picasso (Picasso’s
Sculptures), published in the late 1940s. His
application of collage techniques to three-dimen-
sional work had led him to break down the pre-
vailing hierarchy of materials. This was to in-
fluence much subsequent post-1945 sculpture.
Although the ground for this had already been
broken by Duchamp and his ‘ready mades’, Pi-
casso’s use of the objet trouvé was different.
Duchamp’s true successors were the Surrealists,
who exploited the associations triggered off by
the juxtapositions of disparate objects. Picasso,
on the other hand, was more interested in the
forms created by discarded objects, evident in
his practice of casting in bronze his final assem-
blage of found objects after covering them in
plaster. This division, between sculpture that
demands a formal reading and that which works
by association, still persists.
Jean Arp’s postwar sculptures also worked
as plastic statements rather than through as-
sociation, despite his previous involvement
with Surrealism. His biomorphic shapes can
be read as distillations of natural forms, body
parts, and so on. Here seemed to be an exam-
ple of sculpture that was arguably ‘abstract’
but not descended from Constructivism.
However, Arp’s very originality isolated him
and although, like Giacometti, he had imita-
tors, his postwar work produced no real suc-
cessors, although its echoes can be found in
the sculpture of Anish Kapoor working in
England and some of the more recent work of
Claes Oldenburg in the United States.
The first generation of entirely new names
in sculpture in postwar France were to be-
come, for the most part, members of that
(fairly disparate) group of artists dubbed by
the critic Pierre Restany Nouveaux Réalistes.
César established his reputation in 1960 with
his series of Compressions, works consisting
of scraps of multicoloured metal from old cars.
This was followed in 1967 with his Expan-
sions, for which he exploited the properties of
the new material polyurethane. The actual
creation of these sculptures was turned into a
series of Happenings.
Nouveau Réalisme was, loosely speaking,
the French equivalent of British or American
Pop Art of the 1960s, although the individual-
ism of its main players ensured that it was a
short-lived movement. Apart from César, those
working in three dimensions included Arman,
who is best known for his accumulations of
everyday objects of the same type—echoes here
of Warhol—as well as for his assemblages of
objects cut into strips. He has cast some pieces
in bronze, a practice which recalls Jasper
Johns’s beer cans as well as Picasso.
Niki de Saint-Phalle was also at work in
the 1960s, creating her Nanas, figures made
of polystyrene painted in primary colours. The
use of this new material, associated with mass
production and a product of the industrial/
consumer age, together with the sexual and
feminist overtones in her work, identifies her
with the issues of that decade and popular cul-
ture in particular. But Saint-Phalle seems also
to have been inspired by another artist whose
roots go back to the prewar period, Jean
Dubuffet. His painted objects of expanded
polystyrene made in the 1960s were to develop
into often monumental sculptures of steel and
fibreglass.
The work of Daniel Spoerri and much of
the creative output of Yves Klein, also one-
time Nouveaux Réalistes, can be loosely clas-
sified as sculpture whose idiom is that of Pop
Art. Spoerri’s tableaux pièges, debris ran-
domly displayed in glass-sided boxes, and
Yves Klein’s sponges and ‘aerostatic sculp-
tures’, crossed the boundaries that tradition-
ally separated high art from popular art.
sculpture