
196 G.
Freiling and V. Yurko
Ω
δ,2
:= −
1
4π
3
∑
k=1
K
δ
(x)
f
k
(ξ)
ξ
k
−x
k
r
3
dξ.
By
virtue
of (4.5.5),
|Ω
δ,2
| ≤
3M
4π
K
δ
(x)
dξ
r
2
≤ 3Mδ.
T
ak
e ε > 0. Since f (ξ) ∈C(
D), there
e
xists δ > 0 such that |f (ξ) − f (x)| ≤ ε for ξ ∈
S
δ
(x). Then |Ω
δ,1
| ≤ ε. Thus, |∆u(x) − f (x)| ≤ 3Mδ + ε, and consequently, ∆u = f .
Theorem 4.5.1 is proved. 2
4.6. The Method of Integral Equations
1. Let for definiteness n = 3, and let D ⊂ R
3
be a bounded domain with the boundary
Σ ∈ PC
1
, D
1
= R
3
\
D. W
e
consider the functions
Q(x) =
Σ
q(ξ)
r
d
s, F(x)
=
Σ
f (ξ)
∂
ξ
(
1
r
)
∂n
ξ
d
s
, (4.6.1)
where q(ξ), f (ξ) ∈C(Σ), r = kξ−xk and n
ξ
is the outer normal to Σ at the point ξ. The
function Q(x) is called the single-layer potential with the density q(ξ). The function F(x)
is called the double-layer potential with the density f (ξ).
Physical sense: Q(x) is the potential of the field created by charges distributed on Σ
with the density q(ξ), and F(x) is the potential of the field created by the dipole distribu-
tion on Σ with the density f (ξ).
Idea of the method: The basic integral formula for harmonic functions (see Section 4.1)
contains terms of the form (4.6.1). We will seek solutions of the Dirichlet and Neumann
problems in the form (4.6.1). As a result we will obtain some integral equations for finding
q and f . Beforehand we will study properties of the functions defined by (4.6.1).
2. Auxiliary assertions
Everywhere in Section 4.6 we will assume that Σ ∈ C
2
, i.e. Σ has a continuous and
bounded curvature. This means that for each fixed x ∈ Σ one can choose a local coordinate
system (α
1
,α
2
,α
3
) such that the origin coincides with the point x, the plane (α
1
,α
2
) co-
incides with the tangent plane to Σ at the point x, and the axis α
3
coincides with the outer
normal ¯n
x
to Σ at the point x (see fig. 4.6.1). Moreover, there exists δ
0
> 0 (independent
of x ) such that the part of the surface Σ
δ
0
(x) := Σ ∩K
δ
0
(x) is represented by a single-
valued function α
3
= Φ(α
1
,α
2
) , Φ ∈C
2
and
¯
¯
¯
∂
2
Φ
∂α
k
∂α
j
¯
¯
¯
≤ Φ
0
for ρ :=
q
α
2
1
+ α
2
2
≤ δ
0
,
where Φ
0
does
not
depend on x (it is the maximal curvature). In the sequel, we assume
that δ
0
< 1/(8Φ
0
). Since Φ(0,0) = Φ
α
1
(0,0) = Φ
α
2
(0,0) = 0, we have by virtue of the
Taylor formula:
|Φ(α
1
,α
2
)| ≤ Φ
0
ρ
2
, |Φ
α
k
(α
1
,α
2
)| ≤ 2Φ
0
ρ for ρ :=
q
α
2
1
+ α
2
2
≤ δ
0
. (4.6.2)