susceptibility is commonly anisotropic and this anisotropy has an orientation:
hence, AMS is second order tensor, K
ij
and can be represented as an ellipsoid.
Three groups of minerals contribute to the susceptibility (Rochette et al.,
1992). (1) Ferrimagnetic minerals include those that are generally considered
to be ‘magnetic’, that is they have a significant remanent magnetism. They
have a much higher susceptibility than other minerals and will dominate the
susceptibility of a rock when the measurement is carried out under normal
conditions, in a low field. The most well-known ferrimagnetic minerals are
magnetite, ilmenite, pyrrhotite, garnet and hematite. (2) Paramagnetic min-
erals have lower susceptibilities, but may be present in larger quantities than
ferrimagnetic minerals. Those minerals that are richer in iron will generally
have a higher susceptibility. Important minerals of this group are pyroxenes,
amphiboles, staurolite, cordierite and biotite. (3) Diamagnetic minerals have a
very low negative susceptibility; this means that the induced field has an
opposite polarity to the applied field. These minerals are only important in
the absence of ferrimagnetic or paramagnetic minerals. Prominent diamag-
netic minerals are quartz and calcite. The total anisotropy of magnetic suscept-
ibility of a rock is produced by the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of the
mineral grains, if they have a LPO. It is also produced by the SPO of minerals
which have a significant total susceptibility, but which are not necessarily
anisotropic (e.g. garnet).
AMS analysis produces a susceptibility ellipsoid whose principal axes
are labelled k
1
k
2
k
3
(or k
max
, k
int
and k
min
). The parameters of the
ellipsoid are commonly reduced to orientation, mean susceptibility (k
m
¼
(k
1
þ k
2
þ k
3
)/3), lineation parameter (L ¼ k
1
/k
2
), foliation parameter
(F ¼ k
2
/k
3
) and degree of anisotropy (P ¼ k
1
/k
3
). The shape of the magnetic
anisotropy ellipsoid can be displayed on a ‘Flinn-type’ diagram (Flinn, 1962),
where L is plotted against F.
Most interpretations of AMS data are based on the following assumptions
(Borradaile, 1988, Rochette et al., 1992, Borradaile & Henry, 1997). (1) The
AMS ellipsoid is coaxial to the fabric, with the k
3
axis perpendicular to the
foliation and the k
1
parallel to the lineation. (2) The shape of the AMS ellipsoid
is related to the rock fabric, in terms of intensity of foliation and lineation
development. (3) AMS measurements are not affected by remanent magnet-
ism. These assumptions must be verified by comparison with independent
mineral fabric measurements using any of the methods described in this
chapter. Where they are correct the magnetic fabric is called ‘normal’. In
some cases it is found that the k
1
axis is perpendicular to the foliation and
the k
2
axis is parallel to the lineation. This is called a ‘reverse magnetic fabric’.
In other cases k
2
is perpendicular to the foliation, which is referred to as an
178 Grain orientations: rock fabric