
tially dangerous effects upon the environment is important, and slime control
programs must be planned accordingly. New types of biocides are being developed
continuously to meet changing regulatory demands in regard to reduction of, e.g.,
toxicity and environmental impact. The main problems to note under practical
conditions are environmental security, the manner of dosage (concentration,
points of input in the system), and efficiency under process conditions. No one
biocide will effectively kill all the bacteria present in the water system. This has led
to the development of wide spectrum biocides.
Strategies used in biocidal control of microbiological slime problems include
narrowing the spectrum of the bacterial population, thereby also reducing the
formation of biofilms. To preclude the development of resistant microbe popula-
tions, a biocide should be periodically substituted by another one functioning by a
different mechanism. The required dosage of biocides can be greatly reduced by
determination and selection of the correct biocides for the particular species of
microbes causing the problem. It should be kept in mind, however, that the re-
quired dosage can depend greatly upon pH. For example, thiocarbamates are effec-
tive in an acidic environment; however, as pH is raised toward neutral, the effect
falls off dramatically due to the shorter half-life (about 18 h at pH 6 but less than
2 h at pH 7).
Knowledge of the composition of slime deposits and the formation mechanisms
of biofilms has led to more selective slime control agents, in combination with the
use of chemicals that are capable of either penetrating the biofilms or dispersing
the deposits. So less toxic substances can be used in the system and keeping
machine surfaces is easier.
In slime control without application of biocides, chemicals are avoided as far as
possible. Some examples of elimination of slime without biocides are bacteriphage
application, enzyme application and removal of nutrients. Slime-decomposing en-
zyme systems and specific viruses that kill specific bacteria have been developed.
The Biochem method for example, uses modified lignosulfonate as a complex
former. It neutralizes metabolites by electrostatic discharge, thereby making the
nutrients nonusable by microbes. It also chelates essential trace elements present
in the circuit system. Another product group to reduce deposit build-up, primarily
microbiological slime, in the circuit system of a paper machine is the so-called
“biological dispersing agents” or biodispersants. Principally, they are combinations
of surfactants that have been optimized to dissolve pockets of slime, but they are
usually also capable of breaking up other (primarily hydrophobic) deposits. These
products, which are sometimes also used in combination with enzymes, are based
on natural terpenes (oil of oranges), paraffin, lignosulfanates, or various deter-
gents (tensides). Which product to use depends on the type of raw materials em-
ployed in the paper manufacturing process and the specific problem to be solved.
If numerous microorganisms are introduced into the process (e.g. through the use
of surface water), there is sometimes no alternative to the additional use of bio-
cides. Biodispersants are effective in three ways. First they infiltrate the deposit
(the so-called “creep effect”), then break it apart. Finally, they envelop the deposit in
a chemical coating (surface passivation). These processes can be observed by
3 Chemical Additives136