
surrounding area. In addition, BTI occasionally repaired
BYS turbines in its workshop facilities. An increasing
number of people who had seen these few turbines oper-
ating successfully in the hills went to Butwal to request
assistance in installing similar plants in their villages.
Initially, these potential customers went elsewhere
because of BTl?s limited capacity, its involvement with
other work, and its inability to dedicate sufficient time
and staff to the design of turbines. As BTFs workshop
capacity increased, however, there was increasing pres-
sure to look for new manufacturing ventures. After dis-
cussions with potential customers, local staff, and
employees about existing needs that the workshop might
meet, the board of directors of both BTI and DCS
approved a proposal for a pilot hydropower project.
Although both villagers and the government often seek
electricity for lighting, this is not a primary need.
Some kerosene is used for lighting, but, aside from fire-
wood used primarily for cooking, diesel fuel for milling
is more essential to the rural population. The proposed
pilot project therefore focused on providing energy for
milling. Because of the emphasis on this need, it was
possible to develop and perfect designs for a turbine and
associated hardware for driving agro-processing
machinery directly, without relying on expensive and
technologically complex electrical components.
From BTI’s experience with the BYS turbines and obser-
vations of existing hydropower installations, the need
for a broad, well-coordinated program was apparent.
This program needed to include both the design and
fabrication of reliable, low-cost turbines and field
teams with a broad range of expertise to:
l
evaluate sites,
l
discuss options for technical designs and financing
with prospective customers,
l
design the necessary civil and mechanical works,
l
install machinery, and
a undertake the necessary followup maintenance work.
In 1975, the UMN received a grant for $24,000 to esta-
blish such a program. In addition, BTI funded the cost
of turbine development and part of the test site facility.
Two full-time and several part-time expatriate engi-
neers and staff members
were
fully supported by their
sponsoring organizations. Because the program was
planned to be financially self-supporting, with income
from sales covering overhead and development costs,
the grant reflected only working capital and start-up
costs.
DCS took primary responsibility for field work. This
included customer contact, i;ite survey, plant layout,
ordering and assembling of all machinery and materials
for delivery, installation, and followup repairs. BTI (and
later BEW) became the contractor for the fabricated
parts. In addition, BTI retained responsibility
for
tur-
bine research, development, and testing, because these
contributed to its manufacturing and marketing activi-
ties.
Organizationally, it might have seemed more straight-
forward to keep the entire program within BTI. How-
ever, its previous experience with a footbridge program
indicated that sending
workshop
personnel into the field
disrupted installation work, workshop planning, and pro-
duction. In addition, salaries
for
workers in the field
were also higher than those for workshop staff, creating
conflict between workers. Because this program had
growth potential, it was made a separate program
within the DCS framework
from
the beginning.
During the initial phases of the project, progress was
slow. The self-imposed limitation
of
using only mate-
rials available in Nepal and the Indian subcontinent
required that
many
items be designed and manufactured
in Nepal, when importing them would have been far eas-
ier. In X977, the first three water
turbine-powered mills
were installed in the hills of Nepal. This was followed
by 11 installations in 1978 and increasing numbers in
subsequent years. By 1982, a total of 65 mills had been
installed.
Teclmical designs
Selection of turbine type
Innumerable small streams with steep gradients are
located in the central hill region of Nepal, which sup-
ports most of that country’s population. Peaks rise to a
height of 3000 m. Unlike the Himalayas to the north,
with their perennial snow-fed streams, streams in the
central region are entirely
rain- and spring-fed.
Although monsoon rains lead to heavy floods, stream-
flows are extremely low by the end of the dry season in
April and May. These conditions are not uncommon to
many tropical countries with hydropower potential.
Under those circumstances, a Pelton turbine, which
operates under a high head and requires relatively low
flows, appeared to be most appropriate. However, even
the single Pelton turbine fabricated by Butwal is still in
the workshop; it has never been installed.
Turbines operating under high heads have proved less
appropriate in Nepal than those operating under low
heads for several reasons:
l
conflict with irrigation-In the hills terraced for
growing rice and other crops, use of water
for
irriga-
tion assumes primary importance. Water rights are
carefully protected. If water in the streams were
used
for
hydropower generation, it would bypass all
the land between the elevation of the intake to a
hydropower scheme and the elevation of the power-
house and would no longer be available
for
irrigation.
For high-head units, this land may be extensive. The
owner of a water-powered mill could never deprive
farmers of their water. Even where excess water
for power generation would have been available, the
farmers anticipated eventual
loss of control and
blccked further developments. It became apparent
thz :
‘he best sites to develop were those where the
pot. ;hpial mill owner controlled or could purchase the
land between the intake and powerhouse. This
implied that, to minimize conflict, low-head sites
would have to be developed. Another alternative
might have been to exploit high-head sites as a
Case studies 229