
For a CSTR with a single chemical reaction, Eq. 4.3.22 reduces to
_
X
out
_
X
in
¼ rV
R
(4:3:23)
For a single chemical reaction, the extent of the reaction is proportional to the
conversion of reactant A, f
A
, given by Eq. 2.6.5. Hence,
_
X
in
¼
F
A
0
s
A
f
A
in
_
X
out
¼
F
A
0
s
A
f
A
out
and, using Eq. 4.3.10, the depletion rate of reactant A is (2r
A
) ¼ 2s
A
r.
Substituting these into Eq. 4.3.23, we obtain
V
R
¼ F
A
0
f
A
out
f
A
in
(r
A
)
out
(4:3:24)
which is identical to Eq. 4.2.9, the species-based design equation of a CSTR with a
single chemical reaction, expressed in terms of the conversion of reactant A.
4.3.4 Formulation Procedure
The reaction-based design equations (Eqs. 4.3.8, 4.4.14, and 4.3.22) are written for
the mth-independent reaction. Since all state variables of the reactor (composition,
temperature, enthalpy, etc.) depend on the extents of the independent reactions, to
design a chemical reactor with multiple reactions, we have to write a design
equation for each of the independent chemical reactions. Since there are always
more chemical species than independent reactions, by formulating the design in
terms of reaction-based design equations, we express the design by the smallest
number of design equations.
As indicated in Chapter 2, we can select different sets of independent reactions.
The question then arises as to what is the most appropriate set of independent reac-
tions for the design formulation. Since the design equations include the rates of all
chemical reactions that actually take place in the reactor, by selecting a set of inde-
pendent reactions among them, we minimize the number of terms in each design
equation. Hence, we adopt the following heuristic rule:
Select a set of independent reactions among the chemical reactions whose
rate expressions are provided.
Or
Do not select a set of independent reactions that includes a chemical reac-
tions whose rate expressions are not provided.
By adopting this heuristic rule, the design equations consist of the least number of
rate terms. Considering that each of them is a function of temperature, and in many
instances, a stiff function, we formulate the design in terms of the most robust set of
algebraic or differential equations for numerical solutions (see Example 4.3).
112 SPECIES BALANCES AND DESIGN EQUATIONS