
AUTOMOBILEENCYCLOPEDIA OF POPULAR CULTURE
141
half of the twentieth century: the extensive modification and rear-
rangement of the country’s built environment to accommodate wide-
spread automobile use. In urban areas, general car ownership under-
mined the centralizing influence of the railroads. Because businesses
could unload railroad freight into motorized trucks instead of horse-
drawn wagons, which significantly reduced their short-haul transpor-
tation costs, proximity to railroad depots became much less impor-
tant. At the same time, growing traffic problems in urban cores along
with a more mobile buying public made relocating to less congested
areas with better parking for their customers an increasingly attractive
option for small-volume businesses.
Although cities continued to expand, Americans used their cars
to move in ever-growing numbers to the suburbs. As early as the
1920s suburban growth had begun to rival that of cities, but only after
World War II did American suburbs come into their own. Beginning
in the mid-1940s, huge real estate developers took advantage of new
technology, federally insured home loans, and low energy costs to
respond to the acute housing shortage that returning GIs, the baby
boom, and pent-up demand from the Depression had created. Devel-
opers purchased large land holdings on the border of cities, bulldozed
everything to facilitate new standardized construction techniques,
and rebuilt the landscape from the ground up. Roads and cars, of
course, were essential components of the suburban developers’
visions. So were large yards (which provided the social spaces for
suburbanites that streets had once supplied for urban residents) and
convenient local shopping centers (with plenty of parking). Even the
design of American houses changed to accommodate automobiles,
with more and more architects including carports or integrated
garages as standard features on new homes.
In rural America, the least direct but most far-reaching effects of
widespread car ownership came as rural institutions underwent a
spatial reorganization in response to the increased mobility and range
of the rural population. In the first decade or so of the century,
religious, educational, commercial, medical, and even mail services
consolidated, enabling them to take advantage of centralized distribu-
tion and economies of scale. For most rural Americans, the centraliza-
tion of institutions meant that by mid-century access to motorized
transportation had become a prerequisite for taking advantage of
many rural services.
At about the same time suburban growth exploded in the mid-
1940s, road engineers began to focus on developing the potential of
automobiles for long-distance travel. For the first several decades of
the century, long-distance travelers by automobile had to rely on
detailed maps and confusing road signs to navigate their courses. In
the 1920s, limited-access roads without stop lights or intersections at
grade became popular in some parts of the country, but most people
judged these scenic, carefully landscaped ‘‘parkways’’ according to
their recreational value rather than their ability to move large numbers
of people quickly and efficiently. By 1939, however, designers like
Norman Bel Geddes began to stress the need for more efficient road
planning, as his ‘‘Futurama’’ exhibit at the New York World’s Fair
demonstrated. Over five million people saw his model city, the most
popular display at the exhibition, which featured elevated freeways
and high-speed traffic coursing through its center. Impressed, many
states followed the lead of Pennsylvania, which in 1940 opened 360
miles of high-speed toll road with gentle grades and no traffic lights.
By 1943, a variety of automobile-related interest groups joined
together to form the American Road Builders Association, which
began lobbying for a comprehensive national system of new super-
highways. Then in 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower appointed a
committee to examine the issue of increasing federal road aid—
headed by a member of the General Motors board of directors. Two
years later, Eisenhower signed the Interstate Highway Act, commit-
ting the federal government to provide ninety percent of the cost of a
41,000-mile highway system, the largest peacetime construction
project in history.
The new interstates transformed the ability of the nation’s road
system to accommodate high-speed long-distance travel. As a result,
the heavy trucking industry’s share of interstate deliveries rose from
about fifteen percent of the national total in 1950 to almost twenty-
five percent by the end of the decade, a trend which accelerated the
decentralization of industry that had started before the war. Suburbs
sprang up even farther away from city limits, and Americans soon
began to travel more miles on interstates than any other type of road.
The new highways also encouraged the development of roadside
businesses that serviced highway travelers. A uniform highway
culture of drive-in restaurants, gas stations, and huge regional shop-
ping malls soon developed, all of it advertised on large roadside
billboards. Industries designed to serve motorists expanded, with the
motel industry in particular growing in lock-step with the interstates,
taking advantage of the same increase in family vacations that caused
visits to national parks to double over the course of the 1950s.
While car designers in the 1950s subordinated all other consid-
erations to style and comfort, engineers focused on boosting accelera-
tion and maximum speed. With eager enthusiasm, Americans em-
braced the large, gas-guzzling, chrome-detailed, tail-finned automobiles
that Detroit produced. Teens in particular developed an entire subcul-
ture with automobiles at the center. Cruising the local strip, hanging
out at drive-in restaurants, drag-racing, and attending drive-in movies
all became standard nationwide pastimes.
Yet trouble brewed beneath the surface of the 1950s car culture,
and in the 1960s and 1970s a number of emerging problems drove
home several negative unanticipated consequences of universal car
ownership. Safety concerns, for example, became increasingly im-
portant in the mid-1960s since annual automobile-related deaths had
increased from roughly 30,000 to 50,000 between 1945 and 1965.
Environmental damage, too, became an issue for many Americans,
who focused on problems like air pollution, oil spills, the tendency of
heavy automobile tourism to destroy scenic areas, and the damaging
effects of new road construction on places ranging from urban
neighborhoods to national wilderness preserves.
In both cases, concerned citizens turned to the government to
regulate the automobile industry after less coercive attempts to
address problems failed. In 1965, Ralph Nader’s Unsafe at Any Speed
galvanized popular concern over motor vehicle safety. Congress
responded in 1966 with the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
Safety Act, which required a number of safety features on all models
beginning in 1968, despite auto industry protests that regulations
would be expensive and ineffective. Within two years of the imple-
mentation of the law, the ratio of deaths to miles driven had declined
steeply, injuring Americans’ trust in the good faith efforts of industry
to respond to consumer concerns without active regulation. Similarly,
since repeated requests to manufacturers throughout the 1950s to
reduce emissions had failed, California required all new cars from
1966 on to have emissions-reducing technology. Other states fol-
lowed suit, discounting the car industry’s claims that once again
solutions would be slow to develop, expensive, and difficult
to implement.