Chapter 7. Getting Personal
78
3. Hesays“Delighted—anyfriendofyoursisafriendofmine.”(Remember,Lojbanselbricanbeusedinbothbridi
andsumti:pendomeansboth‘afriend’,withanarticleinfrontofit,and‘isafriend’,asanindependentselbri.)
4. Jyotisaystoherselfangrily“Whatdoeshewant?”(Becauseitisindirectquotation,thequestionisJyoti’s,notthe
narrator’s,obviously:thisdoesnotmean“WhatwasitthatJyotisaidtoherselfhewanted?”)
Exercise 4
1. sedu’u,intheusualusageofclaimas‘makeastatement’.Lojbangivesdu’uforxusra‘assert,claim’,butthat
pointstothemorelogic-specificsenseof‘claimthatsomethingistrue’.
2. nu.Itiseventsintheworld,ratherthanconcepts,whichusuallyprovokeemotionalresponses.Ifdu’urepresents
somethingyouholdinyourbrain,thennu,notdu’u,isnecessaryafter‘frustrated’:youremotionalresponseistoo
muchofareflexactionforyourperceptiontohavethetimetobecomesomethingyouholdinyourbrain!
3. du’u:agreementisaresponseyouhavetoaconcept;thisconcepthasnotnecessarilybeenputinwords,norare
younecessarilyputtingitinwordsyourself.
4. nu.Confusionisanemotionalresponse,justlikefrustration,andprimarilyinvolveseventsintheworld,rather
thanrationalfacts.(Ifthey’reconfusing,ofcourse,they’reprobablynotallthatrationalinthefirstplace.)
5. du’u:decisionsarethingsyouholdinyourbrain,beforeyoueitherputthemintowords,orintoaction.
Exercise 5
1. mi’o
2. mi(Classiccaseofsomeonespeakingonbehalfofthemany,bytheway.)
3. mi’a,althoughthiscouldbemiiftheexpellerisspeakinginstitutionally,onbehalfoftheassociation.
4. mi’a
5. ma’a
6. mi’o
7. mi’a
Exercise 6
pro-sumti
ra
le la cardoNES. kabri(Itcan’tbelenu zgana ri kei,becausethelenu-sumtiisn’tfinishedyet—andthat
interpretationwouldbeasweirdlyself-referentialasanyEscherdrawing.NotthatLojbanisn’tperfectly
capableofsuchmischief!
Butwecouldn’treferbacktole la cardoNES. kabriwithri,either:thewaysumtiarecountedbytheir
beginnings,theimmediatelyprevioussumtiisnotle la cardoNES. kabri—it’sthela cardoNES.insidethe
phrasele la cardoNES. kabri!Thiskindofannoyancemaygiveyouahintaboutwhyriisnotaspopular
asyoumightthink...)
redo
la suzyn. .e la ranjit.:“Youtwo.”
le go’i le vanju
go’i
la suzyn. ce la ranjit. puzi simxu ninpe’i.Don’tworryabouthowyousaid“SusanandRanjeet”—it’snot
likewe’vecoveredceanyway!(Fortherecord,itmakesasetoutofSusanandRanjeet,sinceasetis
whatsimxulooksfor.SeeLesson14.)
go’ihererefersbacknottotheprevioussentenceinthestory,buttotheprevioussentenceinthecon-
versation.ObviouslyRanjeetwouldn’tbereferringbacktosentenceswrittenbythenarrator.He’snot
meanttorealisehe’sfictional,afterall.
mi
la ranjit.(Justcheckingifyou’reawake...)