
11.3 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS OF VORTEX-SHEDDING FLOWMETERS 271
Siegwarth (1989) discussed tests on specially designed vortex-shedding meters
for application to very high flow rates of liquid oxygen in the space shuttle main
engine ducts. The details of this work may be of interest to those engaged in vortex
flowmeter design.
The claims of manufacturers for applications include
• liquid flows (e.g., liquid N
2
, CO
2
, O
2
, clean liquids, distilled water, glycol, some
acids,
low viscosity hydrocarbons, benzene, diesel, hydraulic oils, creosote, and
tar),
• gas flows [e.g., steam (superheated and saturated) and various gases including
compressed air, methane, N
2
, and CO
2
], and
• cryogenic applications, but not multiphase applications.
In general Yamasaki (1993) saw the meter as an alternative to the orifice meter,
provided it could cover a similar range of fluid parameters. (One manufacturer claims
that costs are about 50% of those for orifice plates.) The sensing method is the main
constraint to extending parametric range. However, temperature range now allows
its use with superheated steam and liquid natural gas (LNG).
11.3.14 FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
There is a need to extend the range of the vortex meter, to improve application data
(e.g., installation effects), and to develop the signal processing.
Zanker and Cousins in their work
as
long ago as 1975 foresaw the dual bluff body,
and, no doubt, there is further development possible in the design of these bodies.
They also mentioned annular ring/coaxially mounted bluff bodies, and Takamoto
and Komiya (1981) also proposed such a ring-shaped bluff body that sheds ring
vortices.
Miau and Hsu (1992) surveyed the flow around axisymmetric disks and rings as
vortex shedders, showed the pattern of vortex loops behind a disk, and were par-
ticularly interested in the flow characteristics near the pipe wall, suggesting that
an advantage of the axisymmetric designs is that the sensing can be on the pipe
wall. Axisymmetric vortex-shedding rings intuitively offer an elegant axisymmmet-
ric version of the meter. Tai et al. (1993) discussed optimum size and positioning
and signal-to-noise ratio. Cousins and Hayward
(1993,
cf. Cousins et al. 1989) de-
scribed developments of the vortex ring flowmeter and discussed sensing options.
They made the point that ring vortices are far more stable than those from straight
bluff
bodies.
They suggested that a ring/pipe diameter ratio of 0.4 is about optimum.
They found that the signal-to-noise ratio varies markedly across the pipe and down
the centerline, peaking at 3 to 4 ring widths downstream. They found that the inner
ring vortices give a clearer signal. The provisional design, which appears to be opti-
mal is a double ring with a tail; it appears to give a repeatability of
±0.1%
or better
with only 0.3 velocity head pressure loss.
The combination of electrostatic sensing as described by El Wahed and Sproston
(1991) with ring vortex shedders could be very attractive. The sensor could be in the
wall of the tube or even at various points to give greater intelligence to the meter
and forms of self-monitoring.