1988) by population density (¼ frequency, if the size intervals are constant).
X-ray tomographic studies have improved the quality of the CSDs by the
elimination of stereological effects (Carlson et al., 1995). In all studies there
appear to be no small crystals; however, the lower size limit of detection is
not generally well defined and hence this feature may be in some cases an
artefact.
There has been much debate on the interpretation of garnet CSDs. The
most popular theory is that garnet nucleated, grew and then became coar-
sened by Ostwald ripening following the LSW model (Cashman & Ferry,
1988, Miyazaki, 1996). Coarsening requires transport of material between
crystals and this is easy if there is a fluid present (silicate or water dominated),
or if the transport distance is short, as in monomineralic rocks. Carlson
(1999) has argued that Ostwald ripening is severely limited by diffusion
in polymineralic rocks under metamorphic conditions. He also points out
that the shape of the garnet CSDs is not that expected for LSW coarsening.
However, it has been pointed out that the LSW model may not be the
most appropriate for geological materials (DeHoff, 1991, Higgins, 1998). In
addition it is possible that deformation promotes circulation of fluids
by opening up channels. An interesting twist on the problem is suggested
by the data of Daniel and Spear (1999). They looked at Mn zoning patterns
in garnet crystals and concluded that they were formed by the nucleation
and growth of many crystals that subsequently rotated slightly and
coalescenced.
3.4.6.2 Accessory minerals
Accessory minerals are very important for geochemical modelling and geo-
chronology, but little quantitative work has been done on their textures, except
for zircon (see Section 3.4.3.3). Zeh ( 2004) examined the CSDs of apatite,
allanite and titanite in four gneiss samples that were metamorphosed to max-
imum temperatures of 550 8C to 680 8C. He used a variety of 3-D techniques to
determine the CSDs of these minerals over a large size range. All CSDs are
unimodal, concave down. On a classical CSD diagram the peak shifts to larger
sizes as the slope of the right side fans around to shallower slopes. Zeh (2004)
constructed a complicated growth history using the growth model of Eberl
et al.(1998) followed by coarsening. However, the CSD patterns closely
resemble the progression seen in other rocks that has been explained just
by coarsening (e.g. Cashman & Ferry, 1988, Higgins, 1998), especially that
following the ‘Communicating Neighbours’ equations of DeHoff (1991).
Coarsening in metamorphic rocks may be ubiquitous; hence the nature of
the original CSD is not observable.
130 Grain and crystal sizes