
The exergonic formation of methyl cyanide and the endergonic formation of
methyl iodide are one and the same reaction. The reactions share exactly the same
transition state; only the ease of reaching it is different (ΔG
‡
forward
ΔG
‡
reverse
).The
energy difference between the starting material and the product (ΔG°) is the differ-
ence between the two activation energies.
The rates of the forward and reverse reactions are determined by the magni-
tudes of the activation energies for the two halves of the reaction. They are inti-
mately related to the equilibrium constant for the reaction K, determined by ΔG°
[Eq. (8.7)].
ΔG
‡
reverse
ΔG
‡
forward
ΔG° RT ln K (8.7)
The principle of microscopic reversibility says that if we know the mechanism
of a forward reaction, we know the mechanism of the reverse reaction. One diagram
suffices to tell all about both forward and reverse reactions. Figures 8.17 and 8.18
are in reality a single diagram describing both reactions, in this case one “forward”
and exergonic, the other “reverse” and endergonic. There is no lower-energy route
from methyl cyanide and iodide ion back to methyl iodide and cyanide ion.The low-
est-energy path back is exactly the reverse of the path forward.
The classic analogy for this idea pictures the molecules as crossing a high moun-
tain pass.The best path (lowest energy, or lowest altitude) from village A to village B
is the best path (lowest energy, lowest altitude) back from village B to village A. If
there were a lower-energy route back from B to A, it would have been the better route
from A to B as well (Fig. 8.20).
346 CHAPTER 8 Equilibria
Village A
Village B
Had there been a lower-energy path (green)
it would still be the best path in both directions
Best = lowest-energy path from A to B. This
is also the best path back from B to A
Village A
Village B
FIGURE 8.20 Molecules, unlike
explorers, take the best (lowest-
energy) path. You might take the red
path from A to B and the orange
path back, but a molecule wouldn’t.
The Energy versus Reaction progress diagram for the S
N
1 reaction is more
complicated than that for the S
N
2 reaction, because there are more steps than in
the S
N
2 reaction. We dealt with the description of the S
N
1 reaction as a sequence
of equilibria earlier (Fig. 8.2). Let’s again take the reaction of tert-butyl iodide with