
305
LIMITS
OF
THE
FOURIER
TRANSFORM
So
if
we suspend
our
rigor for a moment, we can naively suppose Equation
9.2
lets
us write the transform of the step function
of
Figure 9.2 as
-i
wfi'
(9.5)
Applying Equation 9.2 one more time, with reckless abandon, gives the Fourier
transform of the ramp function as
-1
w2J2.rr'
(9.6)
Of course, we know neither the step function nor the ramp have legitimate Fourier
transforms. This is confirmed by examining the inverse Fourier integral of the
trans-
form functions given in Equations
9.5
and
9.6.
The inversion for Equation
9.5
is
and the inversion
for
Equation 9.6 is
(9.7)
Neither
of
these integrations can be performed because of the divergence of the
integrands at
w
=
0.
If
you
look
at the representations of these integrals in the
complex 9-plane, you will notice that a pole sits right on the Fourier contour.
This is the problem we examined briefly at the end of the previous chapter. By
modifying the contour
to
dip below the offending pole, as shown in Figure
9.3,
we actually can recover the original function
from
the transform function given
in Equation
9.6.
We will show
this
in the next section. Our sloppy derivation of the
ramp function's transform must contain some grain
of
truth. By examining the inverse
process a little more closely, we can
arrive
at the basis
for
the Laplace transform.
Second-Order Pole of imag
elcot
g-plane
o2
/-
\
2n
-
\
real
-
A
-
3
Figure
9.3
A
Modified Fourier Contour
for
the
Ramp
Function