
614
INTRODUCTION
TO
GROUP
THEORY
we can generate another representation
GLEl
by simply transforming the coordinate
basis.
If
[TI
is the transformation matrix, then the second representation is related to
the first via the relations
(15.33)
Keep
in
mind, the same transformation matrix
[TI
must be applied to all the
giA1
elements. It is obvious that both representations are of the same dimension and obey
the same multiplication table. Notice Equation
15.33
is in the form of a
similarity
transformation, like that of Equation
15.23,
so
the matrices of the new representation
will have the same character
as
the
original
representation.
Two matrix representations are said to
be
equivalent
if
you can obtain one from the
other using the type of operation described in quation
15.33.
In
contrast,
inequivalent
representations cannot
be
generated from one another by simply transforming the
coordinate basis. Obviously,
two
representations of different dimension will always
be inequivalent, but it
is
also possible to have two inequivalent representations of the
same dimension.
If, using the same transformation matrix, all elements of a representation can
be
put
into the form of
a
direct
sum
of two or more smaller blocks, the original representation
is said to be
reducible.
If
it cannot, it
is
irreducible.
The irreducible representations
of a group are important because any representation can be transformed to a direct
sum
of
one
or
more irreducible representations. We will discuss
this
in more detail,
later in
this
chapter.
It
turns
out that the number of inequivalent irreducible representations is not
infinite, but rather equal to the number of different classes in the group.
In
order to
distinguish these enumerable irreducible representations from the infinite possible
reducible ones, we use a slightly different notation for the two.
If
a representation is
reducible, we use a letter
in
the brackets. For example, the reducible representation
of
C4
we developed in Equation
15.31
was called
CiEJ.
The
representation
Ci2]
is
obviously irreducible (because it is one-dimensional) and
so
is labeled with a number.
~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~
Example
15.3
As
a simple example of the reduction of a representation, consider
the
Cyl
representation of the
C4
cyclic group, which was shown in Table
15.17.
We would like to know if, using some similarity transformation, can we write
this
representation
as
the direct
sum
of two
1
X
1
matrices.
In
other words, is
this
representation reducible?
Since these matrices are two-dimensional,
to
reduce them any further is equivalent
to diagonalizing them.
In
Chapter
4,
we discussed a general method for finding the
transformation matrix which diagonalizes
a
given matrix. Let's apply
this
method to
find the matrix
[TI
which diagonalizes the
gyl
matrix element of
CY].
First, we find
the eigenvalues using the determinant equation
(1
5.34)