
REFERENCE
DATA
FOR
ENGINEERS
gating radio-frequency waves with phase veloci-
ties appreciably less than the velocity of light.
Recent
Trends
Dramatic progress in device performance and capa-
bility has been achieved in the 1980s and 1990s. These
advances can be credited
to
a
combination of device
innovation, enhanced understanding gained through
improved modeling and design, introduction of supe-
rior materials and subassembly components, and
development of advanced vacuum processing and con-
struction techniques. The most familiar types of micro-
wave power tube, invented in the decade spanning the
mid-1930s and 1940s, may be broadly classified
as
“slow-wave’’ devices. This description
as
being slow-
wave emphasizes the fundamental requirement in
these devices that the phase velocity of the electromag-
netic wave on the interaction circuit must be approxi-
mately equal to the velocity of the electron stream if
energy transfer between the beam and the wave is to
occur. The electron velocity is less than the speed of
light and hence the wave phase velocity must also be
slower than the speed of light in free space. From the
richness of device concepts investigated through the
1960s, the helix and coupled cavity traveling-wave
tubes (TWTs), the klystron, magnetron, and crossed
field amplifier (CFA) have emerged
as
the primary
products
of
today’s technology. The continuing vitality
of this relatively mature segment of the technology is
demonstrated by the recent development of
a
hybrid
amplifier architecture, the microwave power module
(MPM), that combines the best features of solid-state
and vacuum technologies. This hybrid approach yields
a
cost-competitive amplifier that offers the power, effi-
ciency, and bandwidth of
a
TWT with the reduced
noise and functionality of a solid-state amplifier with
either discrete
or
monolithic components. Most signif-
icantly, this performance is obtained in
a
miniaturized
package that can be
a
small fraction of the size of a
comparable TWT amplifier (TWTA) or an
all
solid-
state power amplifier (SSPA).
The most dramatic of the modem trends, however,
is the extension of device operation into the spectral
range well beyond the microwave. Beginning in the
mid-l960s, two new classes
of
powerful “fast-wave’’
device,
the
gyro-oscillator/amplifier
and the free
electron laser (FEL), have experienced ongoing
development. In fast-wave devices, the phase velocity
of the electromagnetic wave exceeds the speed of
light in the interaction region. Although the physical
interaction mechanism is not the same, gyro-devices
are technologically very similar to other microwave
power tubes. They differ primarily by their intrinsic
need for magnetic field strengths typically available
only from superconducting magnets. In recent years,
gyro-oscillators have produced output powers
approaching
a
megawatt in the frequency range of
100-200
GHz
with the pulse duration nearing
a
sec-
ond.
In
the guise of the ubitron, free electron masers
are much akin to their slow-wave cousins. By using
electrons at relativistic energies, the operational
domain of the FEL is extended to much shorter wave-
length. For this extension,
a
high-energy electron
accelerator replaces the electron gun and optical cav-
ities replace the interaction circuits of the microwave
power tube. Free electron lasers are now generating
usable levels of tunable power
at
submillimeter wave-
lengths and in the infrared and promise to provide
high-power, continuously tunable coherent sources
over
a
spectral range extending into the ultraviolet
and eventually
to
x rays.
For very general comparison of device limits, the
average power density,
Pavf2,
in units
of
(MW)(GHz)’,
has been used
as
a
figure of merit providing an insight-
ful
basis
for comparing device types and portraying
growth trends in performance. The physical signifi-
cance of
Pa,f2
as
a
figure of merit derives from the fact
that the maximum beam or charge-carrier power that
can be transported through
a
device is proportional
to
the circuit cross-sectional area, which
is
inversely
pro-
portional
to
the operating frequency. Upper limits
in
“power density” were therefore considered
as
intrinsic
to a device design. With this in mind, the progression
of power density for major device types is plotted in
Fig. 17. In general, the power density profile for each
device type exhibits the characteristic S-shaped curve
associated with technological maturity. The slow
progress typical of
a
period of innovation and prelimi-
nary study is followed by the rapid growth associated
with intense development.
As
the fundamental limits
of
a
particular device are approached, progress
becomes more difficult and the curve flattens. Escape
from the limits imposed by
a
particular device concept
requires finding
a
better approach. Following this argu-
ment, we conclude that the vitality of a technology is
measured by its ability
to
provide research opportuni-
ties leading to the next step.
As
seen by the sustained growth in achieved power
density, RF vacuum electronics continue to provide
such opportunity. The history of RF vacuum electron-
ics can be viewed as successive waves of scientific
innovation driven by technical opportunity coupled
with market demand.
First,
the gridded tube is over-
taken by the magnetron under the impetus of wartime
demands. Then, the high-power linear-beam
tubes,
the
klystron and the coupled cavity
TWT,
move to the fore
in response to accelerator and radar interests. Finally,
the gyro-oscillator and the
FEL
surpass
slow-wave
devices in the mid-1970s. With these transitions, the
envelope of vacuum device performance, as defined by
the straight line in Fig. 17, continues to grow exponen-
tially at
an
approximate rate of one-and-a-half orders
of magnitude per decade,
a
rate sustained for the past
60
years.
In
contrast to the fast-wave devices, the
fig-
ures
of
merit for the slow-wave devices have grown
very little since the mid-1960s.
One significant exception to limited growth with
slow-wave devices is the
periodic-permanent-magnet-
(PPM-) focused helix
TWT,
whose pace of growth